Foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, annual growth in Chile
Chile: Foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, annual growth was 4.23 % change on previous year in 2017. ◆ Volatile
Foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, annual growth in Chile, 1961–2017
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
Chile recorded 4.23 % change on previous year for foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, annual growth in 2017.
The figure is up 190.6% on the previous year and up 223.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, annual growth in Chile peaked at 170.01 % change on previous year in 1961 and was at its lowest, -55.78 % change on previous year, in 1962.
Chile ranks 56th of 178 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, annual growth in Chile, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 170.01 % change on previous year | — |
| 1962 | -55.78 % change on previous year | -132.8% |
| 1963 | -28.08 % change on previous year | -49.7% |
| 1964 | 36.93 % change on previous year | -231.5% |
| 1965 | 73.55 % change on previous year | +99.1% |
| 1966 | -7.31 % change on previous year | -109.9% |
| 1967 | -45.3 % change on previous year | +519.8% |
| 1968 | 15.54 % change on previous year | -134.3% |
| 1969 | -15.31 % change on previous year | -198.5% |
| 1970 | 59.87 % change on previous year | -491.1% |
| 1971 | -18.04 % change on previous year | -130.1% |
| 1972 | -25.06 % change on previous year | +38.9% |
| 1973 | 8.68 % change on previous year | -134.6% |
| 1974 | -2.07 % change on previous year | -123.8% |
| 1975 | 12.57 % change on previous year | -708.5% |
| 1976 | -2.94 % change on previous year | -123.4% |
| 1977 | 26.15 % change on previous year | -989.0% |
| 1978 | -13.2 % change on previous year | -150.5% |
| 1979 | -23.22 % change on previous year | +76.0% |
| 1980 | -12.42 % change on previous year | -46.5% |
| 1981 | -6.93 % change on previous year | -44.2% |
| 1982 | -5.44 % change on previous year | -21.6% |
| 1983 | 17.14 % change on previous year | -415.4% |
| 1984 | -0.1673 % change on previous year | -101.0% |
| 1985 | 47.86 % change on previous year | -28706.4% |
| 1986 | -30.34 % change on previous year | -163.4% |
| 1987 | 6.84 % change on previous year | -122.5% |
| 1988 | 4.35 % change on previous year | -36.4% |
| 1989 | 28.28 % change on previous year | +550.7% |
| 1990 | 24.7 % change on previous year | -12.6% |
| 1991 | 26.98 % change on previous year | +9.2% |
| 1992 | -19.77 % change on previous year | -173.3% |
| 1993 | 20.51 % change on previous year | -203.8% |
| 1994 | -20.03 % change on previous year | -197.7% |
| 1995 | -16.44 % change on previous year | -17.9% |
| 1996 | -6.04 % change on previous year | -63.3% |
| 1997 | -4.19 % change on previous year | -30.6% |
| 1998 | -11.91 % change on previous year | +184.2% |
| 1999 | -22.45 % change on previous year | +88.6% |
| 2000 | -0.3723 % change on previous year | -98.3% |
| 2001 | 14.72 % change on previous year | -4053.7% |
| 2002 | -12.97 % change on previous year | -188.1% |
| 2003 | 4.37 % change on previous year | -133.7% |
| 2004 | 12.43 % change on previous year | +184.1% |
| 2005 | 43.12 % change on previous year | +247.0% |
| 2006 | -50.04 % change on previous year | -216.0% |
| 2007 | -3.43 % change on previous year | -93.1% |
| 2008 | -2.49 % change on previous year | -27.6% |
| 2009 | 4.33 % change on previous year | -274.0% |
| 2010 | 49.99 % change on previous year | +1055.8% |
| 2011 | -33.48 % change on previous year | -167.0% |
| 2012 | 0.512 % change on previous year | -101.5% |
| 2013 | -0.641 % change on previous year | -225.2% |
| 2014 | 14.54 % change on previous year | -2368.5% |
| 2015 | -18.76 % change on previous year | -229.0% |
| 2016 | -4.67 % change on previous year | -75.1% |
| 2017 | 4.23 % change on previous year | -190.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 16.03 % change on previous year | -55.78 % change on previous year | 170.01 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 1970s | 2.27 % change on previous year | -25.06 % change on previous year | 59.87 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | 4.92 % change on previous year | -30.34 % change on previous year | 47.86 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | -2.86 % change on previous year | -22.45 % change on previous year | 26.98 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.9675 % change on previous year | -50.04 % change on previous year | 43.12 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.46 % change on previous year | -33.48 % change on previous year | 49.99 % change on previous year | 8 |
Countries ranked near Chile
- 53 Uzbekistan 5.39 % change on previous year compare
- 54 Senegal 4.67 % change on previous year compare
- 55 Burundi 4.36 % change on previous year compare
- 57 Cyprus 3.51 % change on previous year compare
- 58 Saudi Arabia 3.31 % change on previous year compare
- 59 Peru 3.09 % change on previous year compare
More reference data data for Chile
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9268 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.22 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.33 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2204 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 5.33 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.11 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.46 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 11.45 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 25.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.2 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, annual growth in Chile?
- Foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, annual growth in Chile was 4.23 % change on previous year in 2017, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, annual growth recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 170.01 % change on previous year in 1961.
- What is the lowest foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, annual growth recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was -55.78 % change on previous year in 1962.
- How does Chile rank for foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, annual growth?
- Chile ranks 56th out of 178 countries with data for 2017.
- Is foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, annual growth rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is up 223.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 57 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans OECD (2026) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.