FAO projections of arable land, per unit of GDP in Japan
Japan: FAO projections of arable land, per unit of GDP was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2023. ◆ Volatile
FAO projections of arable land, per unit of GDP in Japan, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in hectares per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
In 2023, fao projections of arable land, per unit of gdp in Japan stood at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.
That represents a change of up 0.8% on the previous year and up 13.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, fao projections of arable land, per unit of gdp in Japan peaked at 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP in 1961 and was at its lowest, 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, in 2012.
Japan ranks 178th of 205 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
FAO projections of arable land, per unit of GDP in Japan, year by year
| Year | hectares per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1962 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -11.7% |
| 1963 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -12.6% |
| 1964 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -14.8% |
| 1965 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -10.5% |
| 1966 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -14.0% |
| 1967 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -15.5% |
| 1968 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -16.1% |
| 1969 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -17.0% |
| 1970 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -14.5% |
| 1971 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -12.3% |
| 1972 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -25.2% |
| 1973 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -26.9% |
| 1974 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -10.4% |
| 1975 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -8.7% |
| 1976 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -11.6% |
| 1977 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -19.1% |
| 1978 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -29.1% |
| 1979 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -4.3% |
| 1980 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -4.8% |
| 1981 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -9.6% |
| 1982 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +7.1% |
| 1983 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -9.1% |
| 1984 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -5.8% |
| 1985 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -6.0% |
| 1986 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -33.0% |
| 1987 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -18.1% |
| 1988 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -17.8% |
| 1989 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -0.2% |
| 1990 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -3.1% |
| 1991 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -13.3% |
| 1992 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -9.0% |
| 1993 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -13.0% |
| 1994 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -10.0% |
| 1995 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -10.3% |
| 1996 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +11.3% |
| 1997 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +8.7% |
| 1998 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +9.4% |
| 1999 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -12.2% |
| 2000 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -7.7% |
| 2001 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +12.7% |
| 2002 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +3.9% |
| 2003 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -7.7% |
| 2004 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -7.9% |
| 2005 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +0.9% |
| 2006 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +4.4% |
| 2007 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +0.1% |
| 2008 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -10.8% |
| 2009 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -3.7% |
| 2010 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -8.5% |
| 2011 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -8.1% |
| 2012 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -1.1% |
| 2013 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +19.8% |
| 2014 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +5.3% |
| 2015 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +9.4% |
| 2016 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -11.8% |
| 2017 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +0.8% |
| 2018 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -2.8% |
| 2019 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -2.3% |
| 2020 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +0.5% |
| 2021 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -1.2% |
| 2022 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +16.8% |
| 2023 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +0.8% |
Japan compared with similar countries
- Japan's 0 hectares per US$ of GDP is below the median for high income countries, which is 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, 40% of the median. (77 countries reporting)
- Japan's 0 hectares per US$ of GDP is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, 4% of the median. (35 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | 9 |
| 1970s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 4 |
Countries ranked near Japan
- 175 Barbados 0 hectares per US$ of GDP compare
- 176 Djibouti 0 hectares per US$ of GDP compare
- 177 New Caledonia 0 hectares per US$ of GDP compare
- 179 Netherlands 0 hectares per US$ of GDP compare
- 180 South Korea 0 hectares per US$ of GDP compare
- 181 Ireland 0 hectares per US$ of GDP compare
More reference data data for Japan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.19 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.981 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 4.49 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3629 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 4.49 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.98 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 4.16 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 5.57 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 23.74 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.98 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is fao projections of arable land, per unit of gdp in Japan?
- Fao projections of arable land, per unit of gdp in Japan was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest fao projections of arable land, per unit of gdp recorded in Japan?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP in 1961.
- What is the lowest fao projections of arable land, per unit of gdp recorded in Japan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2012.
- How does Japan rank for fao projections of arable land, per unit of gdp?
- Japan ranks 178th out of 205 countries with data for 2023.
- Is fao projections of arable land, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Japan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 13.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Japan data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of FAO projections of arable land, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
FAO projections of arable land divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
FAO projections of arable land ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- FAO projections of arable land Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
FAO projections of arable land divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.