FAO projections of arable land, per unit of GDP in Brazil
Brazil: FAO projections of arable land, per unit of GDP was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2023. ◆ Volatile
FAO projections of arable land, per unit of GDP in Brazil, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in hectares per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
In 2023, fao projections of arable land, per unit of gdp in Brazil stood at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 10.9% on the previous year and up 14.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, fao projections of arable land, per unit of gdp in Brazil peaked at 0.0018 hectares per US$ of GDP in 1961 and was at its lowest, 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, in 2011.
Brazil ranks 93rd of 205 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
FAO projections of arable land, per unit of GDP in Brazil, year by year
| Year | hectares per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0018 hectares per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1962 | 0.0017 hectares per US$ of GDP | -8.7% |
| 1963 | 0.0014 hectares per US$ of GDP | -16.1% |
| 1964 | 0.0016 hectares per US$ of GDP | +12.9% |
| 1965 | 0.0015 hectares per US$ of GDP | -5.2% |
| 1966 | 0.0012 hectares per US$ of GDP | -19.3% |
| 1967 | 0.0011 hectares per US$ of GDP | -7.6% |
| 1968 | 0.001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -7.0% |
| 1969 | 0.001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -7.4% |
| 1970 | 0.0009 hectares per US$ of GDP | -10.9% |
| 1971 | 0.0008 hectares per US$ of GDP | -10.5% |
| 1972 | 0.0007 hectares per US$ of GDP | -13.7% |
| 1973 | 0.0005 hectares per US$ of GDP | -27.9% |
| 1974 | 0.0004 hectares per US$ of GDP | -21.6% |
| 1975 | 0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP | -12.5% |
| 1976 | 0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP | -9.3% |
| 1977 | 0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP | -7.1% |
| 1978 | 0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP | -6.2% |
| 1979 | 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP | -4.0% |
| 1980 | 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP | -1.4% |
| 1981 | 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP | -6.5% |
| 1982 | 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP | -3.4% |
| 1983 | 0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP | +45.3% |
| 1984 | 0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP | +2.3% |
| 1985 | 0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP | -9.3% |
| 1986 | 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP | -19.4% |
| 1987 | 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP | -11.3% |
| 1988 | 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP | -10.0% |
| 1989 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -27.1% |
| 1990 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | +4.9% |
| 1991 | 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP | +9.9% |
| 1992 | 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP | +2.0% |
| 1993 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -13.0% |
| 1994 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -31.6% |
| 1995 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -33.4% |
| 1996 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -7.8% |
| 1997 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -1.9% |
| 1998 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | +4.1% |
| 1999 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | +46.6% |
| 2000 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -6.9% |
| 2001 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | +19.1% |
| 2002 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | +11.7% |
| 2003 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -7.1% |
| 2004 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -15.2% |
| 2005 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -23.7% |
| 2006 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -18.2% |
| 2007 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -20.4% |
| 2008 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -17.3% |
| 2009 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +2.2% |
| 2010 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -24.2% |
| 2011 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -15.2% |
| 2012 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +6.6% |
| 2013 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +0.1% |
| 2014 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +1.1% |
| 2015 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +36.9% |
| 2016 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +0.8% |
| 2017 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -12.6% |
| 2018 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +7.6% |
| 2019 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +2.3% |
| 2020 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +26.9% |
| 2021 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -11.7% |
| 2022 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -14.4% |
| 2023 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -10.9% |
Brazil compared with similar countries
- Brazil's 0 hectares per US$ of GDP is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, 1.1× the median. (58 countries reporting)
- Brazil's 0 hectares per US$ of GDP is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, 2.2× the median. (38 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0014 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0.001 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0.0018 hectares per US$ of GDP | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0005 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0.0009 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 4 |
Countries ranked near Brazil
More reference data data for Brazil
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 13.82 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 72.83 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 139.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 9.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 139.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 46.34 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 18.99 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 405.35 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 699.19 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 49.04 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is fao projections of arable land, per unit of gdp in Brazil?
- Fao projections of arable land, per unit of gdp in Brazil was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest fao projections of arable land, per unit of gdp recorded in Brazil?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0018 hectares per US$ of GDP in 1961.
- What is the lowest fao projections of arable land, per unit of gdp recorded in Brazil?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2011.
- How does Brazil rank for fao projections of arable land, per unit of gdp?
- Brazil ranks 93rd out of 205 countries with data for 2023.
- Is fao projections of arable land, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Brazil?
- Over the last ten years it is up 14.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Brazil data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of FAO projections of arable land, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
FAO projections of arable land divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
FAO projections of arable land ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- FAO projections of arable land Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
FAO projections of arable land divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.