Equality of political power across social groups score in Tunisia
Tunisia: Equality of political power across social groups score was 1.34 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2025)
1.34
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
55th
of 176 countries
All-time high
2.36
in 2012
All-time low
-2.38
in 1882
Years of data
237
1789–2025
Equality of political power across social groups score in Tunisia, 1789–2025
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
Tunisia recorded 1.34 for equality of political power across social groups score in 2025.
That represents a change of down 20.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, equality of political power across social groups score in Tunisia peaked at 2.36 in 2012 and was at its lowest, -2.38, in 1882.
That places Tunisia 55th out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Equality of political power across social groups score in Tunisia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | -2.36 | — |
| 1790 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1791 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1792 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1793 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1794 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1795 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1796 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1797 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1798 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1799 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1800 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1801 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1802 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1803 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1804 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1805 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1806 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1807 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1808 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1809 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1810 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1811 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1812 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1813 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1814 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1815 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1816 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1817 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1818 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1819 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1820 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1821 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1822 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1823 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1824 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1825 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1826 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1827 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1828 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1829 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1830 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1831 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1832 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1833 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1834 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1835 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1836 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1837 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1838 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1839 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1840 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1841 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1842 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1843 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1844 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1845 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1846 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1847 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1848 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1849 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1850 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1851 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1852 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1853 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1854 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1855 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1856 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1857 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1858 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1859 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1860 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1861 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1862 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1863 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1864 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1865 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1866 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1867 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1868 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1869 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1870 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1871 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1872 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1873 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1874 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1875 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1876 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1877 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1878 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1879 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1880 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1881 | -2.36 | -0.0% |
| 1882 | -2.38 | +0.8% |
| 1883 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1884 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1885 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1886 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1887 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1888 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1889 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1890 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1891 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1892 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1893 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1894 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1895 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1896 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1897 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1898 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1899 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1900 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1901 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1902 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1903 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1904 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1905 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1906 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1907 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1908 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1909 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1910 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1911 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1912 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1913 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1914 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1915 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1916 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1917 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1918 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1919 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1920 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1921 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1922 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1923 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1924 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1925 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1926 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1927 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1928 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1929 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1930 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1931 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1932 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1933 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1934 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1935 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1936 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1937 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1938 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1939 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1940 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1941 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1942 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1943 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1944 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1945 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1946 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1947 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1948 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1949 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1950 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1951 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1952 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1953 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1954 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1955 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1956 | -1.52 | -36.4% |
| 1957 | -1.52 | -0.0% |
| 1958 | -0.863 | -43.1% |
| 1959 | -0.863 | -0.0% |
| 1960 | -0.513 | -40.6% |
| 1961 | -0.513 | -0.0% |
| 1962 | -0.513 | -0.0% |
| 1963 | -0.513 | -0.0% |
| 1964 | -0.513 | -0.0% |
| 1965 | -0.513 | -0.0% |
| 1966 | -0.513 | -0.0% |
| 1967 | -0.513 | -0.0% |
| 1968 | -0.513 | -0.0% |
| 1969 | -0.513 | -0.0% |
| 1970 | -0.513 | -0.0% |
| 1971 | -0.513 | -0.0% |
| 1972 | -0.513 | -0.0% |
| 1973 | -0.513 | -0.0% |
| 1974 | -0.513 | -0.0% |
| 1975 | -0.513 | -0.0% |
| 1976 | -0.513 | -0.0% |
| 1977 | -0.591 | +15.2% |
| 1978 | -0.591 | -0.0% |
| 1979 | -0.591 | -0.0% |
| 1980 | -0.591 | -0.0% |
| 1981 | -0.591 | -0.0% |
| 1982 | -0.591 | -0.0% |
| 1983 | -0.591 | -0.0% |
| 1984 | -0.591 | -0.0% |
| 1985 | -0.591 | -0.0% |
| 1986 | -0.591 | -0.0% |
| 1987 | -0.591 | -0.0% |
| 1988 | 0.474 | -180.2% |
| 1989 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 0.477 | +0.6% |
| 2011 | 1.72 | +260.8% |
| 2012 | 2.36 | +37.1% |
| 2013 | 1.91 | -18.9% |
| 2014 | 1.87 | -2.1% |
| 2015 | 1.69 | -9.9% |
| 2016 | 1.69 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 1.69 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 1.69 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 1.69 | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 1.85 | +9.7% |
| 2021 | 1.68 | -9.1% |
| 2022 | 1.68 | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 1.34 | -20.1% |
| 2024 | 1.34 | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 1.34 | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | -2.36 | -2.36 | -2.36 | 1 |
| 1790s | -2.36 | -2.36 | -2.36 | 10 |
| 1800s | -2.36 | -2.36 | -2.36 | 10 |
| 1810s | -2.36 | -2.36 | -2.36 | 10 |
| 1820s | -2.36 | -2.36 | -2.36 | 10 |
| 1830s | -2.36 | -2.36 | -2.36 | 10 |
| 1840s | -2.36 | -2.36 | -2.36 | 10 |
| 1850s | -2.36 | -2.36 | -2.36 | 10 |
| 1860s | -2.36 | -2.36 | -2.36 | 10 |
| 1870s | -2.36 | -2.36 | -2.36 | 10 |
| 1880s | -2.38 | -2.38 | -2.36 | 10 |
| 1890s | -2.38 | -2.38 | -2.38 | 10 |
| 1900s | -2.38 | -2.38 | -2.38 | 10 |
| 1910s | -2.38 | -2.38 | -2.38 | 10 |
| 1920s | -2.38 | -2.38 | -2.38 | 10 |
| 1930s | -2.38 | -2.38 | -2.38 | 10 |
| 1940s | -2.38 | -2.38 | -2.38 | 10 |
| 1950s | -1.91 | -2.38 | -0.863 | 10 |
| 1960s | -0.513 | -0.513 | -0.513 | 10 |
| 1970s | -0.5364 | -0.591 | -0.513 | 10 |
| 1980s | -0.378 | -0.591 | 0.474 | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.474 | 0.474 | 0.474 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.474 | 0.474 | 0.474 | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.68 | 0.477 | 2.36 | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.54 | 1.34 | 1.85 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Tunisia
- 52 Papua New Guinea 1.4 compare
- 53 Sierra Leone 1.39 compare
- 54 Somalia 1.39 compare
- 56 Jamaica 1.34 compare
- 57 Mozambique 1.34 compare
- 58 Latvia 1.32 compare
More reference data data for Tunisia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.148 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.38 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1317 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.38 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4961 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.1849 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 8.07 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 14.52 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.7169 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is equality of political power across social groups score in Tunisia?
- Equality of political power across social groups score in Tunisia was 1.34 in 2025, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest equality of political power across social groups score recorded in Tunisia?
- The highest recorded value was 2.36 in 2012.
- What is the lowest equality of political power across social groups score recorded in Tunisia?
- The lowest recorded value was -2.38 in 1882.
- How does Tunisia rank for equality of political power across social groups score?
- Tunisia ranks 55th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is equality of political power across social groups score rising or falling in Tunisia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 20.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Tunisia data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Equality of political power across social groups score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).