Equality of political power across social groups score in Taiwan, China
Taiwan, China: Equality of political power across social groups score was 1.6 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2025)
1.6
Change on year
up 27.0%
World rank
37th
of 176 countries
All-time high
1.83
in 2020
All-time low
-2.72
in 1900
Years of data
232
1789–2025
Equality of political power across social groups score in Taiwan, China, 1789–2025
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
Taiwan, China recorded 1.6 for equality of political power across social groups score in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 27.0% on the previous year and up 14.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, equality of political power across social groups score in Taiwan, China peaked at 1.83 in 2020 and was at its lowest, -2.72, in 1900.
Taiwan, China ranks 37th of 176 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Equality of political power across social groups score in Taiwan, China, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | -2.39 | — |
| 1790 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1791 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1792 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1793 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1794 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1795 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1796 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1797 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1798 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1799 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1800 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1801 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1802 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1803 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1804 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1805 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1806 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1807 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1808 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1809 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1810 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1811 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1812 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1813 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1814 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1815 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1816 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1817 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1818 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1819 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1820 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1821 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1822 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1823 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1824 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1825 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1826 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1827 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1828 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1829 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1830 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1831 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1832 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1833 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1834 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1835 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1836 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1837 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1838 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1839 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1840 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1841 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1842 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1843 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1844 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1845 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1846 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1847 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1848 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1849 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1850 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1851 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1852 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1853 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1854 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1855 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1856 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1857 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1858 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1859 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1860 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1861 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1862 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1863 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1864 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1865 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1866 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1867 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1868 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1869 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1870 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1871 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1872 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1873 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1874 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1875 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1876 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1877 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1878 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1879 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1880 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1881 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1882 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1883 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1884 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1885 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1886 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1887 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1888 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1889 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1890 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1891 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1892 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1893 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1894 | -2.39 | -0.0% |
| 1900 | -2.72 | +13.8% |
| 1901 | -2.72 | -0.0% |
| 1902 | -2.72 | -0.0% |
| 1903 | -2.72 | -0.0% |
| 1904 | -2.72 | -0.0% |
| 1905 | -2.72 | -0.0% |
| 1906 | -2.72 | -0.0% |
| 1907 | -2.72 | -0.0% |
| 1908 | -2.72 | -0.0% |
| 1909 | -2.72 | -0.0% |
| 1910 | -2.72 | -0.0% |
| 1911 | -2.72 | -0.0% |
| 1912 | -2.72 | -0.0% |
| 1913 | -2.72 | -0.0% |
| 1914 | -2.72 | -0.0% |
| 1915 | -2.72 | -0.0% |
| 1916 | -2.72 | -0.0% |
| 1917 | -2.72 | -0.0% |
| 1918 | -2.72 | -0.0% |
| 1919 | -2.72 | -0.0% |
| 1920 | -2.72 | -0.0% |
| 1921 | -2.72 | -0.0% |
| 1922 | -2.72 | -0.0% |
| 1923 | -2.72 | -0.0% |
| 1924 | -2.72 | -0.0% |
| 1925 | -2.72 | -0.0% |
| 1926 | -2.72 | -0.0% |
| 1927 | -2.72 | -0.0% |
| 1928 | -2.72 | -0.0% |
| 1929 | -2.72 | -0.0% |
| 1930 | -2.72 | -0.0% |
| 1931 | -2.72 | -0.0% |
| 1932 | -2.72 | -0.0% |
| 1933 | -2.72 | -0.0% |
| 1934 | -2.72 | -0.0% |
| 1935 | -2.72 | -0.0% |
| 1936 | -2.72 | -0.0% |
| 1937 | -2.72 | -0.0% |
| 1938 | -2.72 | -0.0% |
| 1939 | -2.72 | -0.0% |
| 1940 | -2.72 | -0.0% |
| 1941 | -2.72 | -0.0% |
| 1942 | -2.72 | -0.0% |
| 1943 | -2.72 | -0.0% |
| 1944 | -2.09 | -23.2% |
| 1945 | -2.09 | -0.0% |
| 1946 | -1.28 | -38.7% |
| 1947 | -1.28 | -0.0% |
| 1948 | -1.28 | -0.0% |
| 1949 | -1.28 | -0.0% |
| 1950 | -1.28 | -0.0% |
| 1951 | -1.28 | -0.0% |
| 1952 | -1.28 | -0.0% |
| 1953 | -1.28 | -0.0% |
| 1954 | -1.28 | -0.0% |
| 1955 | -1.28 | -0.0% |
| 1956 | -1.28 | -0.0% |
| 1957 | -1.28 | -0.0% |
| 1958 | -1.28 | -0.0% |
| 1959 | -1.28 | -0.0% |
| 1960 | -1.28 | -0.0% |
| 1961 | -1.28 | -0.0% |
| 1962 | -1.28 | -0.0% |
| 1963 | -1.28 | -0.0% |
| 1964 | -1.28 | -0.0% |
| 1965 | -1.28 | -0.0% |
| 1966 | -1.28 | -0.0% |
| 1967 | -1.28 | -0.0% |
| 1968 | -1.28 | -0.0% |
| 1969 | -1.28 | -0.0% |
| 1970 | -1.09 | -14.8% |
| 1971 | -1.09 | -0.0% |
| 1972 | -0.993 | -8.9% |
| 1973 | -0.993 | -0.0% |
| 1974 | -0.993 | -0.0% |
| 1975 | -0.993 | -0.0% |
| 1976 | -0.993 | -0.0% |
| 1977 | -0.993 | -0.0% |
| 1978 | -0.57 | -42.6% |
| 1979 | -0.57 | -0.0% |
| 1980 | 0.027 | -104.7% |
| 1981 | 0.027 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.027 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.027 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.027 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.027 | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.433 | +1503.7% |
| 1987 | 0.433 | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 0.58 | +33.9% |
| 1989 | 0.58 | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 0.731 | +26.0% |
| 1991 | 0.731 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 1.13 | +54.0% |
| 1993 | 1.13 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 1.13 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 1.13 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 1.13 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 1.13 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 1.13 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 1.13 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 1.61 | +43.2% |
| 2001 | 1.61 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 1.61 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 1.61 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 1.61 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 1.61 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 1.61 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 1.61 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 1.61 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 1.61 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 1.61 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 1.61 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 1.61 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 1.4 | -13.4% |
| 2014 | 1.4 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 1.4 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 1.4 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 1.4 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 1.4 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 1.48 | +5.9% |
| 2020 | 1.83 | +23.7% |
| 2021 | 1.57 | -13.9% |
| 2022 | 1.57 | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 1.57 | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 1.26 | -19.8% |
| 2025 | 1.6 | +27.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | -2.39 | -2.39 | -2.39 | 1 |
| 1790s | -2.39 | -2.39 | -2.39 | 10 |
| 1800s | -2.39 | -2.39 | -2.39 | 10 |
| 1810s | -2.39 | -2.39 | -2.39 | 10 |
| 1820s | -2.39 | -2.39 | -2.39 | 10 |
| 1830s | -2.39 | -2.39 | -2.39 | 10 |
| 1840s | -2.39 | -2.39 | -2.39 | 10 |
| 1850s | -2.39 | -2.39 | -2.39 | 10 |
| 1860s | -2.39 | -2.39 | -2.39 | 10 |
| 1870s | -2.39 | -2.39 | -2.39 | 10 |
| 1880s | -2.39 | -2.39 | -2.39 | 10 |
| 1890s | -2.39 | -2.39 | -2.39 | 5 |
| 1900s | -2.72 | -2.72 | -2.72 | 10 |
| 1910s | -2.72 | -2.72 | -2.72 | 10 |
| 1920s | -2.72 | -2.72 | -2.72 | 10 |
| 1930s | -2.72 | -2.72 | -2.72 | 10 |
| 1940s | -2.02 | -2.72 | -1.28 | 10 |
| 1950s | -1.28 | -1.28 | -1.28 | 10 |
| 1960s | -1.28 | -1.28 | -1.28 | 10 |
| 1970s | -0.9278 | -1.09 | -0.57 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.2188 | 0.027 | 0.58 | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.05 | 0.731 | 1.13 | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.61 | 1.61 | 1.61 | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.47 | 1.4 | 1.61 | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.57 | 1.26 | 1.83 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Taiwan, China
More reference data data for Taiwan, China
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.16 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.51 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.2515 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0139 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4506 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3236 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 8.76 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.84 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0594 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.84 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is equality of political power across social groups score in Taiwan, China?
- Equality of political power across social groups score in Taiwan, China was 1.6 in 2025, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest equality of political power across social groups score recorded in Taiwan, China?
- The highest recorded value was 1.83 in 2020.
- What is the lowest equality of political power across social groups score recorded in Taiwan, China?
- The lowest recorded value was -2.72 in 1900.
- How does Taiwan, China rank for equality of political power across social groups score?
- Taiwan, China ranks 37th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is equality of political power across social groups score rising or falling in Taiwan, China?
- Over the last ten years it is up 14.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Taiwan, China data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Equality of political power across social groups score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 232 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).