Equality of political power across social groups score in Guatemala
Guatemala: Equality of political power across social groups score was 1.19 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Latest (2025)
1.19
Change on year
up 444.7%
World rank
68th
of 176 countries
All-time high
1.19
in 2025
All-time low
-2.28
in 1789
Years of data
236
1789–2025
Equality of political power across social groups score in Guatemala, 1789–2025
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
Guatemala recorded 1.19 for equality of political power across social groups score in 2025. That is the highest value across all 236 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 444.7% on the previous year and up 831.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, equality of political power across social groups score in Guatemala peaked at 1.19 in 2025 and was at its lowest, -2.28, in 1789.
That places Guatemala 68th out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 236 years of available data.
Equality of political power across social groups score in Guatemala, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | -2.28 | — |
| 1790 | -2.28 | -0.0% |
| 1791 | -2.28 | -0.0% |
| 1792 | -2.28 | -0.0% |
| 1793 | -2.28 | -0.0% |
| 1794 | -2.28 | -0.0% |
| 1795 | -2.28 | -0.0% |
| 1796 | -2.28 | -0.0% |
| 1797 | -2.28 | -0.0% |
| 1798 | -2.28 | -0.0% |
| 1799 | -2.28 | -0.0% |
| 1800 | -2.28 | -0.0% |
| 1801 | -2.28 | -0.0% |
| 1802 | -2.28 | -0.0% |
| 1803 | -2.28 | -0.0% |
| 1804 | -2.28 | -0.0% |
| 1805 | -2.28 | -0.0% |
| 1806 | -2.28 | -0.0% |
| 1807 | -2.28 | -0.0% |
| 1808 | -2.28 | -0.0% |
| 1809 | -2.28 | -0.0% |
| 1810 | -2.28 | -0.0% |
| 1811 | -2.28 | -0.0% |
| 1812 | -2.28 | -0.0% |
| 1813 | -2.28 | -0.0% |
| 1814 | -2.28 | -0.0% |
| 1815 | -2.28 | -0.0% |
| 1816 | -2.28 | -0.0% |
| 1817 | -2.28 | -0.0% |
| 1818 | -2.28 | -0.0% |
| 1819 | -2.28 | -0.0% |
| 1820 | -2.28 | -0.0% |
| 1821 | -2.28 | -0.0% |
| 1823 | -1.4 | -38.6% |
| 1824 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1825 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1826 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1827 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1828 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1829 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1830 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1831 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1832 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1833 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1834 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1835 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1836 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1837 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1838 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1839 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1840 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1841 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1842 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1843 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1844 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1845 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1846 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1847 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1848 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1849 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1850 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1851 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1852 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1853 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1854 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1855 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1856 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1857 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1858 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1859 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1860 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1861 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1862 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1863 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1864 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1865 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1866 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1867 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1868 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1869 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1870 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1871 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1872 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1873 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1874 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1875 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1876 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1877 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1878 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1879 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1880 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1881 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1882 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1883 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1884 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1885 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1886 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1887 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1888 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1889 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1890 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1891 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1892 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1893 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1894 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1895 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1896 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1897 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1898 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1899 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1900 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1901 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1902 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1903 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1904 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1905 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1906 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1907 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1908 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1909 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1910 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1911 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1912 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1913 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1914 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1915 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1916 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1917 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1918 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1919 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1920 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1921 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1922 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1923 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1924 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1925 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1926 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1927 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1928 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1929 | -1.4 | -0.0% |
| 1930 | -2.11 | +50.8% |
| 1931 | -2.11 | -0.0% |
| 1932 | -2.11 | -0.0% |
| 1933 | -2.11 | -0.0% |
| 1934 | -2.11 | -0.0% |
| 1935 | -2.11 | -0.0% |
| 1936 | -2.11 | -0.0% |
| 1937 | -2.11 | -0.0% |
| 1938 | -2.11 | -0.0% |
| 1939 | -2.11 | -0.0% |
| 1940 | -2.11 | -0.0% |
| 1941 | -2.11 | -0.0% |
| 1942 | -2.11 | -0.0% |
| 1943 | -2.11 | -0.0% |
| 1944 | -0.981 | -53.6% |
| 1945 | -0.68 | -30.7% |
| 1946 | -0.68 | -0.0% |
| 1947 | -0.68 | -0.0% |
| 1948 | -0.68 | -0.0% |
| 1949 | -0.68 | -0.0% |
| 1950 | -0.68 | -0.0% |
| 1951 | -0.68 | -0.0% |
| 1952 | -0.68 | -0.0% |
| 1953 | -0.68 | -0.0% |
| 1954 | -1.16 | +70.7% |
| 1955 | -1.98 | +70.1% |
| 1956 | -1.98 | -0.0% |
| 1957 | -1.98 | -0.0% |
| 1958 | -1.98 | -0.0% |
| 1959 | -1.98 | -0.0% |
| 1960 | -1.98 | -0.0% |
| 1961 | -1.98 | -0.0% |
| 1962 | -1.98 | -0.0% |
| 1963 | -1.98 | -0.0% |
| 1964 | -1.98 | -0.0% |
| 1965 | -1.98 | -0.0% |
| 1966 | -1.98 | -0.0% |
| 1967 | -1.98 | -0.0% |
| 1968 | -1.98 | -0.0% |
| 1969 | -1.98 | -0.0% |
| 1970 | -1.98 | -0.0% |
| 1971 | -1.98 | -0.0% |
| 1972 | -1.98 | -0.0% |
| 1973 | -1.98 | -0.0% |
| 1974 | -1.98 | -0.0% |
| 1975 | -1.98 | -0.0% |
| 1976 | -1.98 | -0.0% |
| 1977 | -1.98 | -0.0% |
| 1978 | -1.98 | -0.0% |
| 1979 | -1.98 | -0.0% |
| 1980 | -1.98 | -0.0% |
| 1981 | -1.98 | -0.0% |
| 1982 | -1.98 | -0.0% |
| 1983 | -1.98 | -0.0% |
| 1984 | -1.59 | -19.2% |
| 1985 | -1.16 | -27.2% |
| 1986 | -0.946 | -18.5% |
| 1987 | -0.946 | -0.0% |
| 1988 | -0.946 | -0.0% |
| 1989 | -0.946 | -0.0% |
| 1990 | -0.946 | -0.0% |
| 1991 | -0.946 | -0.0% |
| 1992 | -0.946 | -0.0% |
| 1993 | -0.946 | -0.0% |
| 1994 | -0.946 | -0.0% |
| 1995 | -0.946 | -0.0% |
| 1996 | -0.685 | -27.6% |
| 1997 | -0.685 | -0.0% |
| 1998 | -0.685 | -0.0% |
| 1999 | -0.685 | -0.0% |
| 2000 | -0.685 | -0.0% |
| 2001 | -0.685 | -0.0% |
| 2002 | -0.685 | -0.0% |
| 2003 | -0.685 | -0.0% |
| 2004 | -0.685 | -0.0% |
| 2005 | -0.685 | -0.0% |
| 2006 | -0.685 | -0.0% |
| 2007 | -0.685 | -0.0% |
| 2008 | -0.685 | -0.0% |
| 2009 | -0.685 | -0.0% |
| 2010 | -0.685 | -0.0% |
| 2011 | -0.685 | -0.0% |
| 2012 | -0.685 | -0.0% |
| 2013 | -0.111 | -83.8% |
| 2014 | 0.028 | -125.2% |
| 2015 | -0.163 | -682.1% |
| 2016 | -0.163 | -0.0% |
| 2017 | -0.367 | +125.2% |
| 2018 | -0.367 | -0.0% |
| 2019 | -0.367 | -0.0% |
| 2020 | -0.367 | -0.0% |
| 2021 | -0.367 | -0.0% |
| 2022 | -0.509 | +38.7% |
| 2023 | -0.051 | -90.0% |
| 2024 | 0.219 | -529.4% |
| 2025 | 1.19 | +444.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | -2.28 | -2.28 | -2.28 | 1 |
| 1790s | -2.28 | -2.28 | -2.28 | 10 |
| 1800s | -2.28 | -2.28 | -2.28 | 10 |
| 1810s | -2.28 | -2.28 | -2.28 | 10 |
| 1820s | -1.6 | -2.28 | -1.4 | 9 |
| 1830s | -1.4 | -1.4 | -1.4 | 10 |
| 1840s | -1.4 | -1.4 | -1.4 | 10 |
| 1850s | -1.4 | -1.4 | -1.4 | 10 |
| 1860s | -1.4 | -1.4 | -1.4 | 10 |
| 1870s | -1.4 | -1.4 | -1.4 | 10 |
| 1880s | -1.4 | -1.4 | -1.4 | 10 |
| 1890s | -1.4 | -1.4 | -1.4 | 10 |
| 1900s | -1.4 | -1.4 | -1.4 | 10 |
| 1910s | -1.4 | -1.4 | -1.4 | 10 |
| 1920s | -1.4 | -1.4 | -1.4 | 10 |
| 1930s | -2.11 | -2.11 | -2.11 | 10 |
| 1940s | -1.28 | -2.11 | -0.68 | 10 |
| 1950s | -1.38 | -1.98 | -0.68 | 10 |
| 1960s | -1.98 | -1.98 | -1.98 | 10 |
| 1970s | -1.98 | -1.98 | -1.98 | 10 |
| 1980s | -1.44 | -1.98 | -0.946 | 10 |
| 1990s | -0.8416 | -0.946 | -0.685 | 10 |
| 2000s | -0.685 | -0.685 | -0.685 | 10 |
| 2010s | -0.3565 | -0.685 | 0.028 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0197 | -0.509 | 1.19 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Guatemala
More reference data data for Guatemala
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9286 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.39 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.72 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1246 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.72 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.11 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.9 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 7.68 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 18.61 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.6786 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is equality of political power across social groups score in Guatemala?
- Equality of political power across social groups score in Guatemala was 1.19 in 2025, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest equality of political power across social groups score recorded in Guatemala?
- The highest recorded value was 1.19 in 2025.
- What is the lowest equality of political power across social groups score recorded in Guatemala?
- The lowest recorded value was -2.28 in 1789.
- How does Guatemala rank for equality of political power across social groups score?
- Guatemala ranks 68th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is equality of political power across social groups score rising or falling in Guatemala?
- Over the last ten years it is up 831.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Guatemala data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Equality of political power across social groups score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 236 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).