Equality of civil liberties across social groups score in Paraguay
Paraguay: Equality of civil liberties across social groups score was -1.14 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Latest (2025)
-1.14
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
162nd
of 176 countries
All-time high
-0.802
in 1993
All-time low
-1.95
in 1811
Years of data
215
1811–2025
Equality of civil liberties across social groups score in Paraguay, 1811–2025
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2025, equality of civil liberties across social groups score in Paraguay stood at -1.14.
The figure is down 5.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, equality of civil liberties across social groups score in Paraguay peaked at -0.802 in 1993 and was at its lowest, -1.95, in 1811.
That places Paraguay 162nd out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 215 years of available data.
Equality of civil liberties across social groups score in Paraguay, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1811 | -1.95 | — |
| 1812 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1813 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1814 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1815 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1816 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1817 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1818 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1819 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1820 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1821 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1822 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1823 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1824 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1825 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1826 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1827 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1828 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1829 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1830 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1831 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1832 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1833 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1834 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1835 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1836 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1837 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1838 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1839 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1840 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1841 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1842 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1843 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1844 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1845 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1846 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1847 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1848 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1849 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1850 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1851 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1852 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1853 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1854 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1855 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1856 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1857 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1858 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1859 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1860 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1861 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1862 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1863 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1864 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1865 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1866 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1867 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1868 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1869 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1870 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1871 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1872 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1873 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1874 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1875 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1876 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1877 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1878 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1879 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1880 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1881 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1882 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1883 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1884 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1885 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1886 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1887 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1888 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1889 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1890 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1891 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1892 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1893 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1894 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1895 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1896 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1897 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1898 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1899 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1900 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1901 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1902 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1903 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1904 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1905 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1906 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1907 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1908 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1909 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1910 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1911 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1912 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1913 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1914 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1915 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1916 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1917 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1918 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1919 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1920 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1921 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1922 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1923 | -1.95 | -0.0% |
| 1924 | -1.3 | -33.3% |
| 1925 | -1.3 | -0.0% |
| 1926 | -1.3 | -0.0% |
| 1927 | -1.3 | -0.0% |
| 1928 | -1.3 | -0.0% |
| 1929 | -1.3 | -0.0% |
| 1930 | -1.3 | -0.0% |
| 1931 | -1.3 | -0.0% |
| 1932 | -1.3 | -0.0% |
| 1933 | -1.3 | -0.0% |
| 1934 | -1.3 | -0.0% |
| 1935 | -1.3 | -0.0% |
| 1936 | -1.3 | -0.0% |
| 1937 | -1.3 | -0.0% |
| 1938 | -1.3 | -0.0% |
| 1939 | -1.3 | -0.0% |
| 1940 | -1.3 | -0.0% |
| 1941 | -1.3 | -0.0% |
| 1942 | -1.3 | -0.0% |
| 1943 | -1.3 | -0.0% |
| 1944 | -1.3 | -0.0% |
| 1945 | -1.3 | -0.0% |
| 1946 | -1.3 | -0.0% |
| 1947 | -1.3 | -0.0% |
| 1948 | -1.3 | -0.0% |
| 1949 | -1.3 | -0.0% |
| 1950 | -1.3 | -0.0% |
| 1951 | -1.3 | -0.0% |
| 1952 | -1.3 | -0.0% |
| 1953 | -1.3 | -0.0% |
| 1954 | -1.91 | +46.4% |
| 1955 | -1.91 | -0.0% |
| 1956 | -1.91 | -0.0% |
| 1957 | -1.91 | -0.0% |
| 1958 | -1.91 | -0.0% |
| 1959 | -1.91 | -0.0% |
| 1960 | -1.91 | -0.0% |
| 1961 | -1.91 | -0.0% |
| 1962 | -1.91 | -0.0% |
| 1963 | -1.91 | -0.0% |
| 1964 | -1.91 | -0.0% |
| 1965 | -1.91 | -0.0% |
| 1966 | -1.91 | -0.0% |
| 1967 | -1.91 | -0.0% |
| 1968 | -1.91 | -0.0% |
| 1969 | -1.91 | -0.0% |
| 1970 | -1.91 | -0.0% |
| 1971 | -1.91 | -0.0% |
| 1972 | -1.91 | -0.0% |
| 1973 | -1.91 | -0.0% |
| 1974 | -1.91 | -0.0% |
| 1975 | -1.91 | -0.0% |
| 1976 | -1.91 | -0.0% |
| 1977 | -1.91 | -0.0% |
| 1978 | -1.91 | -0.0% |
| 1979 | -1.91 | -0.0% |
| 1980 | -1.91 | -0.0% |
| 1981 | -1.91 | -0.0% |
| 1982 | -1.91 | -0.0% |
| 1983 | -1.91 | -0.0% |
| 1984 | -1.91 | -0.0% |
| 1985 | -1.91 | -0.0% |
| 1986 | -1.91 | -0.0% |
| 1987 | -1.91 | -0.0% |
| 1988 | -1.91 | -0.0% |
| 1989 | -1.91 | -0.0% |
| 1990 | -0.885 | -53.5% |
| 1991 | -0.885 | -0.0% |
| 1992 | -0.885 | -0.0% |
| 1993 | -0.802 | -9.4% |
| 1994 | -0.802 | -0.0% |
| 1995 | -0.802 | -0.0% |
| 1996 | -0.802 | -0.0% |
| 1997 | -0.802 | -0.0% |
| 1998 | -0.802 | -0.0% |
| 1999 | -0.802 | -0.0% |
| 2000 | -0.802 | -0.0% |
| 2001 | -0.802 | -0.0% |
| 2002 | -0.802 | -0.0% |
| 2003 | -0.802 | -0.0% |
| 2004 | -0.802 | -0.0% |
| 2005 | -0.802 | -0.0% |
| 2006 | -0.802 | -0.0% |
| 2007 | -0.802 | -0.0% |
| 2008 | -0.802 | -0.0% |
| 2009 | -0.802 | -0.0% |
| 2010 | -0.802 | -0.0% |
| 2011 | -0.802 | -0.0% |
| 2012 | -0.802 | -0.0% |
| 2013 | -1.2 | +49.4% |
| 2014 | -1.2 | -0.0% |
| 2015 | -1.08 | -10.2% |
| 2016 | -1.08 | -0.0% |
| 2017 | -1.3 | +21.0% |
| 2018 | -1.3 | -0.0% |
| 2019 | -1.13 | -13.1% |
| 2020 | -0.898 | -20.7% |
| 2021 | -1.04 | +15.4% |
| 2022 | -1.27 | +22.8% |
| 2023 | -1.14 | -10.5% |
| 2024 | -1.14 | -0.0% |
| 2025 | -1.14 | -0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1810s | -1.95 | -1.95 | -1.95 | 9 |
| 1820s | -1.95 | -1.95 | -1.95 | 10 |
| 1830s | -1.95 | -1.95 | -1.95 | 10 |
| 1840s | -1.95 | -1.95 | -1.95 | 10 |
| 1850s | -1.95 | -1.95 | -1.95 | 10 |
| 1860s | -1.95 | -1.95 | -1.95 | 10 |
| 1870s | -1.95 | -1.95 | -1.95 | 10 |
| 1880s | -1.95 | -1.95 | -1.95 | 10 |
| 1890s | -1.95 | -1.95 | -1.95 | 10 |
| 1900s | -1.95 | -1.95 | -1.95 | 10 |
| 1910s | -1.95 | -1.95 | -1.95 | 10 |
| 1920s | -1.56 | -1.95 | -1.3 | 10 |
| 1930s | -1.3 | -1.3 | -1.3 | 10 |
| 1940s | -1.3 | -1.3 | -1.3 | 10 |
| 1950s | -1.66 | -1.91 | -1.3 | 10 |
| 1960s | -1.91 | -1.91 | -1.91 | 10 |
| 1970s | -1.91 | -1.91 | -1.91 | 10 |
| 1980s | -1.91 | -1.91 | -1.91 | 10 |
| 1990s | -0.8269 | -0.885 | -0.802 | 10 |
| 2000s | -0.802 | -0.802 | -0.802 | 10 |
| 2010s | -1.07 | -1.3 | -0.802 | 10 |
| 2020s | -1.1 | -1.27 | -0.898 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Paraguay
More reference data data for Paraguay
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.3166 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 5.23 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 7.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.6344 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 7.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.06 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.5539 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 29.48 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 38.68 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 3.45 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is equality of civil liberties across social groups score in Paraguay?
- Equality of civil liberties across social groups score in Paraguay was -1.14 in 2025, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest equality of civil liberties across social groups score recorded in Paraguay?
- The highest recorded value was -0.802 in 1993.
- What is the lowest equality of civil liberties across social groups score recorded in Paraguay?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.95 in 1811.
- How does Paraguay rank for equality of civil liberties across social groups score?
- Paraguay ranks 162nd out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is equality of civil liberties across social groups score rising or falling in Paraguay?
- Over the last ten years it is down 5.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Paraguay data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Equality of civil liberties across social groups score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 215 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).