Equality of Civil Liberties across Social Groups Score in Lithuania
Lithuania: Equality of Civil Liberties across Social Groups Score was 1.63 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Equality of Civil Liberties across Social Groups Score in Lithuania, 1795–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
Lithuania recorded 1.63 for equality of civil liberties across social groups score in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 34.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, equality of civil liberties across social groups score in Lithuania peaked at 2.49 in 1990 and was at its lowest, -0.213, in 1795.
Lithuania ranks 46th of 176 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Equality of Civil Liberties across Social Groups Score in Lithuania, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1795 | -0.213 | — |
| 1796 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1797 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1798 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1799 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1800 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1801 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1802 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1803 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1804 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1805 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1806 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1807 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1808 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1809 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1810 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1811 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1812 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1813 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1814 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1815 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1816 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1817 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1818 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1819 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1820 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1821 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1822 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1823 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1824 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1825 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1826 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1827 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1828 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1829 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1830 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1831 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1832 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1833 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1834 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1835 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1836 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1837 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1838 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1839 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1840 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1841 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1842 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1843 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1844 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1845 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1846 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1847 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1848 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1849 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1850 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1851 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1852 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1853 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1854 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1855 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1856 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1857 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1858 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1859 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1860 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1861 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1862 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1863 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1864 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1865 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1866 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1867 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1868 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1869 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1870 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1871 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1872 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1873 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1874 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1875 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1876 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1877 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1878 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1879 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1880 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1881 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1882 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1883 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1884 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1885 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1886 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1887 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1888 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1889 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1890 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1891 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1892 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1893 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1894 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1895 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1896 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1897 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1898 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1899 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1900 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1901 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1902 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1903 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1904 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1905 | -0.127 | -40.4% |
| 1906 | -0.023 | -81.9% |
| 1907 | -0.023 | -0.0% |
| 1908 | -0.023 | -0.0% |
| 1909 | -0.023 | -0.0% |
| 1910 | -0.023 | -0.0% |
| 1911 | -0.023 | -0.0% |
| 1912 | -0.023 | -0.0% |
| 1913 | -0.023 | -0.0% |
| 1914 | -0.023 | -0.0% |
| 1915 | -0.066 | +187.0% |
| 1916 | -0.066 | -0.0% |
| 1917 | 0.062 | -193.9% |
| 1918 | 0.751 | +1111.3% |
| 1919 | 1.04 | +38.2% |
| 1920 | 1.27 | +22.2% |
| 1921 | 1.27 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 1.27 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 1.27 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 1.27 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 1.27 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 1.53 | +20.5% |
| 1927 | 1.26 | -17.7% |
| 1928 | 1.26 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 1.26 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 1.26 | +0.0% |
| 1931 | 1.26 | +0.0% |
| 1932 | 1.26 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 1.26 | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 1.26 | +0.0% |
| 1935 | 1.26 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 1.26 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 1.26 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 1.26 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 1.26 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 0.163 | -87.0% |
| 1941 | 0.163 | +0.0% |
| 1942 | 0.163 | +0.0% |
| 1943 | 0.163 | +0.0% |
| 1944 | 0.163 | +0.0% |
| 1945 | 0.163 | +0.0% |
| 1946 | 0.163 | +0.0% |
| 1947 | 0.163 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 0.163 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 0.163 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 0.163 | +0.0% |
| 1951 | 0.163 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 0.163 | +0.0% |
| 1953 | 0.163 | +0.0% |
| 1954 | 0.387 | +137.4% |
| 1955 | 0.453 | +17.1% |
| 1956 | 0.453 | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 0.453 | +0.0% |
| 1958 | 0.453 | +0.0% |
| 1959 | 0.453 | +0.0% |
| 1960 | 0.453 | +0.0% |
| 1961 | 0.453 | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 0.521 | +15.0% |
| 1963 | 0.521 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0.521 | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.521 | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 0.521 | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.521 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 0.521 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 0.521 | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 0.521 | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 0.521 | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.521 | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 0.521 | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 0.521 | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 0.444 | -14.8% |
| 1976 | 0.444 | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 0.444 | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 0.444 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.444 | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 0.444 | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 0.444 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.444 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.444 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.444 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.444 | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.476 | +7.2% |
| 1987 | 0.476 | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 0.476 | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 0.476 | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 2.49 | +423.1% |
| 1991 | 2.49 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 2.49 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 2.49 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 2.49 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 2.49 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 2.49 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 2.49 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 2.49 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 2.49 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 2.49 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 2.49 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 2.49 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 2.49 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 2.49 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 2.49 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 2.49 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 2.49 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 2.49 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 2.49 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 2.49 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 2.49 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 2.49 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 2.49 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 2.49 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 2.49 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 2.07 | -16.9% |
| 2017 | 2.07 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 2.07 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 2.07 | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 2.07 | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 2.07 | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 1.63 | -21.2% |
| 2023 | 1.63 | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 1.63 | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 1.63 | +0.0% |
Lithuania compared with similar countries
- Lithuania's 1.63 is above the median for high income countries, which is 1.55, 1.0× the median. (55 countries reporting)
- Lithuania's 1.63 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 1.56, 1.0× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1790s | -0.213 | -0.213 | -0.213 | 5 |
| 1800s | -0.213 | -0.213 | -0.213 | 10 |
| 1810s | -0.213 | -0.213 | -0.213 | 10 |
| 1820s | -0.213 | -0.213 | -0.213 | 10 |
| 1830s | -0.213 | -0.213 | -0.213 | 10 |
| 1840s | -0.213 | -0.213 | -0.213 | 10 |
| 1850s | -0.213 | -0.213 | -0.213 | 10 |
| 1860s | -0.213 | -0.213 | -0.213 | 10 |
| 1870s | -0.213 | -0.213 | -0.213 | 10 |
| 1880s | -0.213 | -0.213 | -0.213 | 10 |
| 1890s | -0.213 | -0.213 | -0.213 | 10 |
| 1900s | -0.1284 | -0.213 | -0.023 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.1604 | -0.066 | 1.04 | 10 |
| 1920s | 1.29 | 1.26 | 1.53 | 10 |
| 1930s | 1.26 | 1.26 | 1.26 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.163 | 0.163 | 0.163 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.3304 | 0.163 | 0.453 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.5074 | 0.453 | 0.521 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.4825 | 0.444 | 0.521 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.4568 | 0.444 | 0.476 | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.49 | 2.49 | 2.49 | 10 |
| 2000s | 2.49 | 2.49 | 2.49 | 10 |
| 2010s | 2.32 | 2.07 | 2.49 | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.78 | 1.63 | 2.07 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Lithuania
More reference data data for Lithuania
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2893 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1106 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1208 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9699 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.6729 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.5859 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.41 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.6578 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is equality of civil liberties across social groups score in Lithuania?
- Equality of civil liberties across social groups score in Lithuania was 1.63 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest equality of civil liberties across social groups score recorded in Lithuania?
- The highest recorded value was 2.49 in 1990.
- What is the lowest equality of civil liberties across social groups score recorded in Lithuania?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.213 in 1795.
- How does Lithuania rank for equality of civil liberties across social groups score?
- Lithuania ranks 46th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is equality of civil liberties across social groups score rising or falling in Lithuania?
- Over the last ten years it is down 34.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Lithuania data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Equality of Civil Liberties across Social Groups Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 231 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which social groups — defined by language, ethnicity, religion, race, region, and/or caste — are free from forced labor, have property rights and access to the justice system, and enjoy freedoms of movement.