Equality of civil liberties across social groups score in Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan: Equality of civil liberties across social groups score was 0.817 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2025)
0.817
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
95th
of 176 countries
All-time high
2.03
in 1993
All-time low
-0.213
in 1789
Years of data
237
1789–2025
Equality of civil liberties across social groups score in Kazakhstan, 1789–2025
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
Kazakhstan recorded 0.817 for equality of civil liberties across social groups score in 2025.
The figure is down 20.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, equality of civil liberties across social groups score in Kazakhstan peaked at 2.03 in 1993 and was at its lowest, -0.213, in 1789.
Kazakhstan ranks 95th of 176 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Equality of civil liberties across social groups score in Kazakhstan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | -0.213 | — |
| 1790 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1791 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1792 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1793 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1794 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1795 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1796 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1797 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1798 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1799 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1800 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1801 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1802 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1803 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1804 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1805 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1806 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1807 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1808 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1809 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1810 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1811 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1812 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1813 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1814 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1815 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1816 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1817 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1818 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1819 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1820 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1821 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1822 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1823 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1824 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1825 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1826 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1827 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1828 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1829 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1830 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1831 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1832 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1833 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1834 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1835 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1836 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1837 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1838 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1839 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1840 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1841 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1842 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1843 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1844 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1845 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1846 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1847 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1848 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1849 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1850 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1851 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1852 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1853 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1854 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1855 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1856 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1857 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1858 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1859 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1860 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1861 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1862 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1863 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1864 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1865 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1866 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1867 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1868 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1869 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1870 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1871 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1872 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1873 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1874 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1875 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1876 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1877 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1878 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1879 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1880 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1881 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1882 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1883 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1884 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1885 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1886 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1887 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1888 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1889 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1890 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1891 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1892 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1893 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1894 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1895 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1896 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1897 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1898 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1899 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1900 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1901 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1902 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1903 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1904 | -0.213 | -0.0% |
| 1905 | -0.127 | -40.4% |
| 1906 | -0.023 | -81.9% |
| 1907 | -0.023 | -0.0% |
| 1908 | -0.023 | -0.0% |
| 1909 | -0.023 | -0.0% |
| 1910 | -0.023 | -0.0% |
| 1911 | -0.023 | -0.0% |
| 1912 | -0.023 | -0.0% |
| 1913 | -0.023 | -0.0% |
| 1914 | -0.023 | -0.0% |
| 1915 | -0.066 | +187.0% |
| 1916 | -0.066 | -0.0% |
| 1917 | 0.062 | -193.9% |
| 1918 | 0.334 | +438.7% |
| 1919 | 0.334 | +0.0% |
| 1920 | 0.334 | +0.0% |
| 1921 | 0.282 | -15.6% |
| 1922 | 0.282 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 0.282 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 0.239 | -15.2% |
| 1925 | 0.239 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 0.239 | +0.0% |
| 1927 | 0.239 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 0.239 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 0.239 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 0.239 | +0.0% |
| 1931 | 0.239 | +0.0% |
| 1932 | 0.239 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 0.239 | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 0.163 | -31.8% |
| 1935 | 0.163 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 0.163 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 0.163 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 0.163 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 0.163 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 0.163 | +0.0% |
| 1941 | 0.163 | +0.0% |
| 1942 | 0.163 | +0.0% |
| 1943 | 0.163 | +0.0% |
| 1944 | 0.163 | +0.0% |
| 1945 | 0.163 | +0.0% |
| 1946 | 0.163 | +0.0% |
| 1947 | 0.163 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 0.163 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 0.163 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 0.163 | +0.0% |
| 1951 | 0.163 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 0.163 | +0.0% |
| 1953 | 0.163 | +0.0% |
| 1954 | 0.387 | +137.4% |
| 1955 | 0.453 | +17.1% |
| 1956 | 0.453 | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 0.453 | +0.0% |
| 1958 | 0.453 | +0.0% |
| 1959 | 0.453 | +0.0% |
| 1960 | 0.453 | +0.0% |
| 1961 | 0.453 | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 0.521 | +15.0% |
| 1963 | 0.521 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0.521 | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.521 | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 0.521 | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.521 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 0.521 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 0.521 | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 0.521 | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 0.521 | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.521 | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 0.521 | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 0.521 | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 0.444 | -14.8% |
| 1976 | 0.444 | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 0.444 | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 0.444 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.444 | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 0.444 | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 0.444 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.444 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.444 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.444 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.444 | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.476 | +7.2% |
| 1987 | 0.476 | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 0.476 | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 0.476 | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 1.83 | +284.9% |
| 1991 | 1.83 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 1.83 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 2.03 | +10.6% |
| 1994 | 2.03 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 2.03 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 1.83 | -9.7% |
| 1997 | 1.83 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 1.28 | -30.1% |
| 1999 | 1.28 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 1.28 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 1.28 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 1.28 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 1.28 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 1.28 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 1.28 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 1.28 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 1.28 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 1.28 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 1.28 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 1.28 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 0.985 | -23.0% |
| 2012 | 0.985 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 1.02 | +3.7% |
| 2014 | 1.02 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 1.02 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 1.02 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 1.02 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0.817 | -20.0% |
| 2019 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | -0.213 | -0.213 | -0.213 | 1 |
| 1790s | -0.213 | -0.213 | -0.213 | 10 |
| 1800s | -0.213 | -0.213 | -0.213 | 10 |
| 1810s | -0.213 | -0.213 | -0.213 | 10 |
| 1820s | -0.213 | -0.213 | -0.213 | 10 |
| 1830s | -0.213 | -0.213 | -0.213 | 10 |
| 1840s | -0.213 | -0.213 | -0.213 | 10 |
| 1850s | -0.213 | -0.213 | -0.213 | 10 |
| 1860s | -0.213 | -0.213 | -0.213 | 10 |
| 1870s | -0.213 | -0.213 | -0.213 | 10 |
| 1880s | -0.213 | -0.213 | -0.213 | 10 |
| 1890s | -0.213 | -0.213 | -0.213 | 10 |
| 1900s | -0.1284 | -0.213 | -0.023 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.0483 | -0.066 | 0.334 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.2614 | 0.239 | 0.334 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.1934 | 0.163 | 0.239 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.163 | 0.163 | 0.163 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.3304 | 0.163 | 0.453 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.5074 | 0.453 | 0.521 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.4825 | 0.444 | 0.521 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.4568 | 0.444 | 0.476 | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.78 | 1.28 | 2.03 | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.28 | 1.28 | 1.28 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.9988 | 0.817 | 1.28 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.817 | 0.817 | 0.817 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Kazakhstan
More reference data data for Kazakhstan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.3 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.52 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 4.95 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.8607 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 4.95 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 4.63 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 10.75 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 25.76 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 4.69 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is equality of civil liberties across social groups score in Kazakhstan?
- Equality of civil liberties across social groups score in Kazakhstan was 0.817 in 2025, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest equality of civil liberties across social groups score recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The highest recorded value was 2.03 in 1993.
- What is the lowest equality of civil liberties across social groups score recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.213 in 1789.
- How does Kazakhstan rank for equality of civil liberties across social groups score?
- Kazakhstan ranks 95th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is equality of civil liberties across social groups score rising or falling in Kazakhstan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 20.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Equality of civil liberties across social groups score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).