Engaged Society Score in Latvia
Latvia: Engaged Society Score was 1.57 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2025)
1.57
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
47th
of 176 countries
All-time high
2.04
in 2010
All-time low
-2.32
in 1826
Years of data
237
1789–2025
Engaged Society Score in Latvia, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for engaged society score in Latvia is 1.57, measured in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, engaged society score in Latvia peaked at 2.04 in 2010 and was at its lowest, -2.32, in 1826.
Latvia ranks 47th of 176 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Engaged Society Score in Latvia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | -1.81 | — |
| 1790 | -1.81 | -0.0% |
| 1791 | -1.81 | -0.0% |
| 1792 | -1.81 | -0.0% |
| 1793 | -1.81 | -0.0% |
| 1794 | -1.81 | -0.0% |
| 1795 | -1.81 | -0.0% |
| 1796 | -2.31 | +27.7% |
| 1797 | -2.31 | -0.0% |
| 1798 | -2.31 | -0.0% |
| 1799 | -2.31 | -0.0% |
| 1800 | -2.31 | -0.0% |
| 1801 | -2.31 | -0.0% |
| 1802 | -1.83 | -20.6% |
| 1803 | -1.83 | -0.0% |
| 1804 | -1.83 | -0.0% |
| 1805 | -1.83 | -0.0% |
| 1806 | -1.83 | -0.0% |
| 1807 | -1.83 | -0.0% |
| 1808 | -1.83 | -0.0% |
| 1809 | -1.83 | -0.0% |
| 1810 | -1.83 | -0.0% |
| 1811 | -1.83 | -0.0% |
| 1812 | -1.83 | -0.0% |
| 1813 | -1.83 | -0.0% |
| 1814 | -1.83 | -0.0% |
| 1815 | -1.83 | -0.0% |
| 1816 | -1.83 | -0.0% |
| 1817 | -1.83 | -0.0% |
| 1818 | -1.83 | -0.0% |
| 1819 | -1.83 | -0.0% |
| 1820 | -1.83 | -0.0% |
| 1821 | -1.83 | -0.0% |
| 1822 | -1.83 | -0.0% |
| 1823 | -1.83 | -0.0% |
| 1824 | -1.83 | -0.0% |
| 1825 | -1.83 | -0.0% |
| 1826 | -2.32 | +26.4% |
| 1827 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1828 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1829 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1830 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1831 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1832 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1833 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1834 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1835 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1836 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1837 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1838 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1839 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1840 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1841 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1842 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1843 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1844 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1845 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1846 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1847 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1848 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1849 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1850 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1851 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1852 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1853 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1854 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1855 | -1.44 | -37.7% |
| 1856 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1857 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1858 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1859 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1860 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1861 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1862 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1863 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1864 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1865 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1866 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1867 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1868 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1869 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1870 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1871 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1872 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1873 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1874 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1875 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1876 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1877 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1878 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1879 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1880 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1881 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1882 | -1.54 | +6.6% |
| 1883 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1884 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1885 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1886 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1887 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1888 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1889 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1890 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1891 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1892 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1893 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1894 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1895 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1896 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1897 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1898 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1899 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1900 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1901 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1902 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1903 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1904 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1905 | -1.06 | -30.9% |
| 1906 | -0.678 | -36.2% |
| 1907 | -0.824 | +21.5% |
| 1908 | -0.9 | +9.2% |
| 1909 | -0.9 | -0.0% |
| 1910 | -0.9 | -0.0% |
| 1911 | -0.9 | -0.0% |
| 1912 | -0.9 | -0.0% |
| 1913 | -0.9 | -0.0% |
| 1914 | -0.9 | -0.0% |
| 1915 | -0.9 | -0.0% |
| 1916 | -0.9 | -0.0% |
| 1917 | 0.682 | -175.8% |
| 1918 | -0.143 | -121.0% |
| 1919 | -0.409 | +186.0% |
| 1920 | 1.4 | -442.1% |
| 1921 | 1.4 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 1.4 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 1.4 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 1.4 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 1.4 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 1.4 | +0.0% |
| 1927 | 1.4 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 1.4 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 1.4 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 1.4 | +0.0% |
| 1931 | 1.4 | +0.0% |
| 1932 | 1.4 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 1.4 | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 0.165 | -88.2% |
| 1935 | -0.543 | -429.1% |
| 1936 | -0.543 | -0.0% |
| 1937 | -0.543 | -0.0% |
| 1938 | -0.543 | -0.0% |
| 1939 | -0.543 | -0.0% |
| 1940 | -2.24 | +313.3% |
| 1941 | -2.24 | -0.0% |
| 1942 | -2.24 | -0.0% |
| 1943 | -2.24 | -0.0% |
| 1944 | -2.24 | -0.0% |
| 1945 | -2.24 | -0.0% |
| 1946 | -2.24 | -0.0% |
| 1947 | -2.24 | -0.0% |
| 1948 | -2.24 | -0.0% |
| 1949 | -2.24 | -0.0% |
| 1950 | -2.24 | -0.0% |
| 1951 | -2.24 | -0.0% |
| 1952 | -2.24 | -0.0% |
| 1953 | -1.86 | -17.2% |
| 1954 | -0.2 | -89.2% |
| 1955 | -0.2 | -0.0% |
| 1956 | -0.082 | -59.0% |
| 1957 | 0.064 | -178.0% |
| 1958 | 0.064 | +0.0% |
| 1959 | 0.064 | +0.0% |
| 1960 | 0.064 | +0.0% |
| 1961 | 0.064 | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 0.064 | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 0.064 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0.035 | -45.3% |
| 1965 | -0.283 | -908.6% |
| 1966 | -0.283 | -0.0% |
| 1967 | -0.283 | -0.0% |
| 1968 | -0.433 | +53.0% |
| 1969 | -0.433 | -0.0% |
| 1970 | -0.433 | -0.0% |
| 1971 | -0.433 | -0.0% |
| 1972 | -0.433 | -0.0% |
| 1973 | -0.433 | -0.0% |
| 1974 | -0.433 | -0.0% |
| 1975 | -0.433 | -0.0% |
| 1976 | -0.433 | -0.0% |
| 1977 | -0.433 | -0.0% |
| 1978 | -0.433 | -0.0% |
| 1979 | -0.433 | -0.0% |
| 1980 | -0.433 | -0.0% |
| 1981 | -0.433 | -0.0% |
| 1982 | -0.433 | -0.0% |
| 1983 | -0.433 | -0.0% |
| 1984 | -0.433 | -0.0% |
| 1985 | -0.209 | -51.7% |
| 1986 | 0.797 | -481.3% |
| 1987 | 0.929 | +16.6% |
| 1988 | 1.02 | +9.7% |
| 1989 | 1.22 | +19.3% |
| 1990 | 1.78 | +46.7% |
| 1991 | 1.97 | +10.2% |
| 1992 | 1.67 | -15.0% |
| 1993 | 1.67 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 1.67 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 1.67 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 1.67 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 1.67 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 1.67 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 1.67 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 1.67 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 1.67 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 1.67 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 1.67 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 1.67 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 1.33 | -20.6% |
| 2006 | 1.33 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 1.41 | +6.2% |
| 2008 | 1.41 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 1.86 | +31.9% |
| 2010 | 2.04 | +10.0% |
| 2011 | 2.04 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 2.04 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 1.57 | -23.1% |
| 2014 | 1.57 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 1.57 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 1.57 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 1.57 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 1.57 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 1.57 | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 1.57 | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 1.57 | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 1.57 | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 1.57 | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 1.57 | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 1.57 | +0.0% |
Latvia compared with similar countries
- Latvia's 1.57 is below the median for high income countries, which is 1.67, 94% of the median. (55 countries reporting)
- Latvia's 1.57 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 1.54, 1.0× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | -1.81 | -1.81 | -1.81 | 1 |
| 1790s | -2.01 | -2.31 | -1.81 | 10 |
| 1800s | -1.93 | -2.31 | -1.83 | 10 |
| 1810s | -1.83 | -1.83 | -1.83 | 10 |
| 1820s | -2.03 | -2.32 | -1.83 | 10 |
| 1830s | -2.32 | -2.32 | -2.32 | 10 |
| 1840s | -2.32 | -2.32 | -2.32 | 10 |
| 1850s | -1.88 | -2.32 | -1.44 | 10 |
| 1860s | -1.44 | -1.44 | -1.44 | 10 |
| 1870s | -1.44 | -1.44 | -1.44 | 10 |
| 1880s | -1.52 | -1.54 | -1.44 | 10 |
| 1890s | -1.54 | -1.54 | -1.54 | 10 |
| 1900s | -1.21 | -1.54 | -0.678 | 10 |
| 1910s | -0.617 | -0.9 | 0.682 | 10 |
| 1920s | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.3046 | -0.543 | 1.4 | 10 |
| 1940s | -2.24 | -2.24 | -2.24 | 10 |
| 1950s | -0.8881 | -2.24 | 0.064 | 10 |
| 1960s | -0.1424 | -0.433 | 0.064 | 10 |
| 1970s | -0.433 | -0.433 | -0.433 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.1587 | -0.433 | 1.22 | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.71 | 1.67 | 1.97 | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.57 | 1.33 | 1.86 | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.71 | 1.57 | 2.04 | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.57 | 1.57 | 1.57 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Latvia
More reference data data for Latvia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.128 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0503 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.4657 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0673 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.4657 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4291 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.2986 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.2679 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3666 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is engaged society score in Latvia?
- Engaged society score in Latvia was 1.57 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest engaged society score recorded in Latvia?
- The highest recorded value was 2.04 in 2010.
- What is the lowest engaged society score recorded in Latvia?
- The lowest recorded value was -2.32 in 1826.
- How does Latvia rank for engaged society score?
- Latvia ranks 47th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is engaged society score rising or falling in Latvia?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Latvia data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Engaged Society Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which ordinary people independently discuss important policy changes among themselves, in the media, in associations or neighborhoods, or in the streets.