Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Palau

Palau: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score was 43.44 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
43.44
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
151st
of 191 countries
All-time high
43.44
in 2003
All-time low
43.44
in 2003
Years of data
17
2003–2019

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Palau, 2003–2019

0102030402003201120192003: 43.42004: 43.42005: 43.42006: 43.42007: 43.42008: 43.42009: 43.42010: 43.42011: 43.42012: 43.42013: 43.42014: 43.42015: 43.42016: 43.42017: 43.42018: 43.42019: 43.4

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Palau stood at 43.44. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Palau peaked at 43.44 in 2003 and was at its lowest, 43.44, in 2003.

That places Palau 151st out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Palau, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Palau, 2003 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2003 43.44 —
2004 43.44 +0.0%
2005 43.44 +0.0%
2006 43.44 +0.0%
2007 43.44 +0.0%
2008 43.44 +0.0%
2009 43.44 +0.0%
2010 43.44 +0.0%
2011 43.44 +0.0%
2012 43.44 +0.0%
2013 43.44 +0.0%
2014 43.44 +0.0%
2015 43.44 +0.0%
2016 43.44 +0.0%
2017 43.44 +0.0%
2018 43.44 +0.0%
2019 43.44 +0.0%

Palau compared with similar countries

  • Palau's 43.44 is below the median for high income countries, which is 64.39, 67% of the median. (62 countries reporting)
  • Palau's 43.44 is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 73.57, 59% of the median. (28 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 43.44 43.44 43.44 7
2010s 43.44 43.44 43.44 10

Countries ranked near Palau

  1. 148 Panama 45.08 compare
  2. 149 Cameroon 44.26 compare
  3. 150 Brazil 44.16 compare
  4. 151 Sudan 43.44 compare
  5. 153 Madagascar 43.36 compare
  6. 154 El Salvador 42.95 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Palau

All data for Palau →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Palau?
Enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Palau was 43.44 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: time (days) - score recorded in Palau?
The highest recorded value was 43.44 in 2003.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: time (days) - score recorded in Palau?
The lowest recorded value was 43.44 in 2003.
How does Palau rank for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
Palau ranks 151st out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is enforcing contracts: time (days) - score rising or falling in Palau?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Palau data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Palau. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-time-days-score/palau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-time-days-score/palau/">Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Palau</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 3,094 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.