Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Oman

Oman: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score was 60.82 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
60.82
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
108th
of 191 countries
All-time high
60.82
in 2003
All-time low
60.82
in 2003
Years of data
17
2003–2019

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Oman, 2003–2019

02040602003201120192003: 60.82004: 60.82005: 60.82006: 60.82007: 60.82008: 60.82009: 60.82010: 60.82011: 60.82012: 60.82013: 60.82014: 60.82015: 60.82016: 60.82017: 60.82018: 60.82019: 60.8

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Oman recorded 60.82 for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in 2019. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Oman peaked at 60.82 in 2003 and was at its lowest, 60.82, in 2003.

Oman ranks 108th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Oman, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Oman, 2003 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2003 60.82
2004 60.82 +0.0%
2005 60.82 +0.0%
2006 60.82 +0.0%
2007 60.82 +0.0%
2008 60.82 +0.0%
2009 60.82 +0.0%
2010 60.82 +0.0%
2011 60.82 +0.0%
2012 60.82 +0.0%
2013 60.82 +0.0%
2014 60.82 +0.0%
2015 60.82 +0.0%
2016 60.82 +0.0%
2017 60.82 +0.0%
2018 60.82 +0.0%
2019 60.82 +0.0%

Oman compared with similar countries

  • Oman's 60.82 is below the median for high income countries, which is 64.39, 94% of the median. (62 countries reporting)
  • Oman's 60.82 is above the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 58.2, 1.0× the median. (23 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 60.82 60.82 60.82 7
2010s 60.82 60.82 60.82 10

Countries ranked near Oman

  1. 105 Benin 61.07 compare
  2. 105 Bosnia and Herzegovina 61.07 compare
  3. 105 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 61.07 compare
  4. 108 Switzerland 60.82 compare
  5. 110 South Africa 60.66 compare
  6. 111 Hungary 60.25 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Oman

All data for Oman →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Oman?
Enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Oman was 60.82 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: time (days) - score recorded in Oman?
The highest recorded value was 60.82 in 2003.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: time (days) - score recorded in Oman?
The lowest recorded value was 60.82 in 2003.
How does Oman rank for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
Oman ranks 108th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is enforcing contracts: time (days) - score rising or falling in Oman?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Oman data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Oman. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-time-days-score/oman/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-time-days-score/oman/">Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Oman</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 3,094 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.