Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Nepal

Nepal: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score was 35.25 in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
35.25
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
161st
of 191 countries
All-time high
35.25
in 2011
All-time low
25.82
in 2003
Years of data
17
2003–2019

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Nepal, 2003–2019

0102030402003201120192003: 25.82004: 25.82005: 25.82006: 25.82007: 25.82008: 25.82009: 25.82010: 25.82011: 35.22012: 35.22013: 35.22014: 35.22015: 35.22016: 35.22017: 35.22018: 35.22019: 35.2

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Nepal recorded 35.25 for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in 2019. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 36.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Nepal peaked at 35.25 in 2011 and was at its lowest, 25.82, in 2003.

Nepal ranks 161st of 191 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 17 years of available data.

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Nepal, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Nepal, 2003 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2003 25.82 —
2004 25.82 +0.0%
2005 25.82 +0.0%
2006 25.82 +0.0%
2007 25.82 +0.0%
2008 25.82 +0.0%
2009 25.82 +0.0%
2010 25.82 +0.0%
2011 35.25 +36.5%
2012 35.25 +0.0%
2013 35.25 +0.0%
2014 35.25 +0.0%
2015 35.25 +0.0%
2016 35.25 +0.0%
2017 35.25 +0.0%
2018 35.25 +0.0%
2019 35.25 +0.0%

Nepal compared with similar countries

  • Nepal's 35.25 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 61.39, 57% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
  • Nepal's 35.25 is above the median for South Asia, which is 18.52, 1.9× the median. (6 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 25.82 25.82 25.82 7
2010s 34.3 25.82 35.25 10

Countries ranked near Nepal

  1. 158 Syria 38.36 compare
  2. 159 Micronesia (country) 37.3 compare
  3. 160 Belize 36.72 compare
  4. 161 Canada 35.25 compare
  5. 163 Seychelles 34.84 compare
  6. 164 Honduras 34.43 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Nepal

All data for Nepal →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Nepal?
Enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Nepal was 35.25 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: time (days) - score recorded in Nepal?
The highest recorded value was 35.25 in 2011.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: time (days) - score recorded in Nepal?
The lowest recorded value was 25.82 in 2003.
How does Nepal rank for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
Nepal ranks 161st out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is enforcing contracts: time (days) - score rising or falling in Nepal?
Over the last ten years it is up 36.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Nepal data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Nepal. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-time-days-score/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-time-days-score/nepal/">Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Nepal</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 3,094 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.