Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Kiribati

Kiribati: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score was 55.74 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
55.74
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
130th
of 191 countries
All-time high
55.74
in 2003
All-time low
55.74
in 2003
Years of data
17
2003–2019

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Kiribati, 2003–2019

02040602003201120192003: 55.72004: 55.72005: 55.72006: 55.72007: 55.72008: 55.72009: 55.72010: 55.72011: 55.72012: 55.72013: 55.72014: 55.72015: 55.72016: 55.72017: 55.72018: 55.72019: 55.7

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Kiribati is 55.74, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Kiribati peaked at 55.74 in 2003 and was at its lowest, 55.74, in 2003.

Kiribati ranks 130th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Kiribati, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Kiribati, 2003 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2003 55.74 —
2004 55.74 +0.0%
2005 55.74 +0.0%
2006 55.74 +0.0%
2007 55.74 +0.0%
2008 55.74 +0.0%
2009 55.74 +0.0%
2010 55.74 +0.0%
2011 55.74 +0.0%
2012 55.74 +0.0%
2013 55.74 +0.0%
2014 55.74 +0.0%
2015 55.74 +0.0%
2016 55.74 +0.0%
2017 55.74 +0.0%
2018 55.74 +0.0%
2019 55.74 +0.0%

Kiribati compared with similar countries

  • Kiribati's 55.74 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 61.39, 91% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
  • Kiribati's 55.74 is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 73.57, 76% of the median. (28 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 55.74 55.74 55.74 7
2010s 55.74 55.74 55.74 10

Countries ranked near Kiribati

  1. 127 Croatia 56.56 compare
  2. 127 Ireland 56.56 compare
  3. 127 Senegal 56.56 compare
  4. 130 Botswana 55.74 compare
  5. 130 Central African Republic 55.74 compare
  6. 133 Czechia 54.26 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Kiribati

All data for Kiribati →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Kiribati?
Enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Kiribati was 55.74 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: time (days) - score recorded in Kiribati?
The highest recorded value was 55.74 in 2003.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: time (days) - score recorded in Kiribati?
The lowest recorded value was 55.74 in 2003.
How does Kiribati rank for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
Kiribati ranks 130th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is enforcing contracts: time (days) - score rising or falling in Kiribati?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Kiribati data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Kiribati. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-time-days-score/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-time-days-score/kiribati/">Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Kiribati</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 3,094 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.