Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Guinea

Guinea: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score was 84.34 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
84.34
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
11th
of 191 countries
All-time high
87.21
in 2003
All-time low
84.34
in 2014
Years of data
17
2003–2019

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Guinea, 2003–2019

0204060802003201120192003: 87.22004: 87.22005: 87.22006: 87.22007: 87.22008: 87.22009: 87.22010: 87.22011: 87.22012: 87.22013: 87.22014: 84.32015: 84.32016: 84.32017: 84.32018: 84.32019: 84.3

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Guinea recorded 84.34 for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in 2019. That is the lowest value across all 17 years on record.

The figure is down 3.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Guinea peaked at 87.21 in 2003 and was at its lowest, 84.34, in 2014.

That places Guinea 11th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Guinea, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Guinea, 2003 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2003 87.21
2004 87.21 +0.0%
2005 87.21 +0.0%
2006 87.21 +0.0%
2007 87.21 +0.0%
2008 87.21 +0.0%
2009 87.21 +0.0%
2010 87.21 +0.0%
2011 87.21 +0.0%
2012 87.21 +0.0%
2013 87.21 +0.0%
2014 84.34 -3.3%
2015 84.34 +0.0%
2016 84.34 +0.0%
2017 84.34 +0.0%
2018 84.34 +0.0%
2019 84.34 +0.0%

Guinea compared with similar countries

  • Guinea's 84.34 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 61.39, 1.4× the median. (47 countries reporting)
  • Guinea's 84.34 is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 61.89, 1.4× the median. (48 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 87.21 87.21 87.21 7
2010s 85.49 84.34 87.21 10

Countries ranked near Guinea

  1. 8 Azerbaijan 87.13 compare
  2. 9 Georgia 86.48 compare
  3. 10 South Korea 86.07 compare
  4. 12 Luxembourg 83.52 compare
  5. 13 Kosovo 82.79 compare
  6. 13 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 82.79 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Guinea

All data for Guinea →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Guinea?
Enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Guinea was 84.34 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: time (days) - score recorded in Guinea?
The highest recorded value was 87.21 in 2003.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: time (days) - score recorded in Guinea?
The lowest recorded value was 84.34 in 2014.
How does Guinea rank for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
Guinea ranks 11th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is enforcing contracts: time (days) - score rising or falling in Guinea?
Over the last ten years it is down 3.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Guinea data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Guinea. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-time-days-score/guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-time-days-score/guinea/">Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Guinea</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 3,094 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.