Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Chad

Chad: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score was 48.93 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
48.93
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
143rd
of 191 countries
All-time high
48.93
in 2003
All-time low
48.93
in 2003
Years of data
17
2003–2019

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Chad, 2003–2019

010203040502003201120192003: 48.92004: 48.92005: 48.92006: 48.92007: 48.92008: 48.92009: 48.92010: 48.92011: 48.92012: 48.92013: 48.92014: 48.92015: 48.92016: 48.92017: 48.92018: 48.92019: 48.9

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Chad stood at 48.93. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Chad peaked at 48.93 in 2003 and was at its lowest, 48.93, in 2003.

That places Chad 143rd out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Chad, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Chad, 2003 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2003 48.93
2004 48.93 +0.0%
2005 48.93 +0.0%
2006 48.93 +0.0%
2007 48.93 +0.0%
2008 48.93 +0.0%
2009 48.93 +0.0%
2010 48.93 +0.0%
2011 48.93 +0.0%
2012 48.93 +0.0%
2013 48.93 +0.0%
2014 48.93 +0.0%
2015 48.93 +0.0%
2016 48.93 +0.0%
2017 48.93 +0.0%
2018 48.93 +0.0%
2019 48.93 +0.0%

Chad compared with similar countries

  • Chad's 48.93 is below the median for low income countries, which is 57.99, 84% of the median. (24 countries reporting)
  • Chad's 48.93 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 61.89, 79% of the median. (48 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 48.93 48.93 48.93 7
2010s 48.93 48.93 48.93 10

Countries ranked near Chad

  1. 140 Lebanon 50.74 compare
  2. 141 Uruguay 50.41 compare
  3. 142 Dominica 49.1 compare
  4. 144 Portugal 47.95 compare
  5. 145 Gambia 47.7 compare
  6. 146 Maldives 47.54 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Chad

All data for Chad →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Chad?
Enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Chad was 48.93 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: time (days) - score recorded in Chad?
The highest recorded value was 48.93 in 2003.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: time (days) - score recorded in Chad?
The lowest recorded value was 48.93 in 2003.
How does Chad rank for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
Chad ranks 143rd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is enforcing contracts: time (days) - score rising or falling in Chad?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Chad data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Chad. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-time-days-score/chad/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-time-days-score/chad/">Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Chad</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 3,094 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.