Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Puerto Rico

Puerto Rico: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) was 11 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
11 DB17-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
48th
of 191 countries
All-time high
11 DB17-20 methodology
in 2018
All-time low
7 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Puerto Rico, 2015–2019

02.557.5102015201720192015: 7 DB17-20 methodology2016: 7 DB17-20 methodology2017: 7 DB17-20 methodology2018: 11 DB17-20 methodology2019: 11 DB17-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.

Analysis

The most recent figure for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Puerto Rico is 11 DB17-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

The figure is up 57.1% over five years.

That places Puerto Rico 48th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top quarter.

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Puerto Rico, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology) in Puerto Rico, 2015 to 2019.
Year DB17-20 methodology Change
2015 7 DB17-20 methodology
2016 7 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%
2017 7 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%
2018 11 DB17-20 methodology +57.1%
2019 11 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%

Countries ranked near Puerto Rico

  1. 48 Canada 11 DB17-20 methodology compare
  2. 48 Grenada 11 DB17-20 methodology compare
  3. 48 Republic of Moldova 11 DB17-20 methodology compare
  4. 48 Poland 11 DB17-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Puerto Rico

All data for Puerto Rico →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Puerto Rico?
Enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Puerto Rico was 11 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) recorded in Puerto Rico?
The highest recorded value was 11 DB17-20 methodology in 2018.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) recorded in Puerto Rico?
The lowest recorded value was 7 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
How does Puerto Rico rank for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
Puerto Rico ranks 48th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Puerto Rico data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Puerto Rico. Statizoid. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-18-db17-20-methodology/puerto-rico-us/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-18-db17-20-methodology/puerto-rico-us/">Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Puerto Rico</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 955 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.