Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Eswatini

Eswatini: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) was 7.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. β–¬ Flat

Latest (2019)
7.5 DB17-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
108th
of 190 countries
All-time high
7.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
All-time low
7.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Eswatini, 2015–2019

024682015201720192015: 7.5 DB17-20 methodology2016: 7.5 DB17-20 methodology2017: 7.5 DB17-20 methodology2018: 7.5 DB17-20 methodology2019: 7.5 DB17-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.

Analysis

Eswatini recorded 7.5 DB17-20 methodology for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over five years.

Eswatini ranks 108th of 190 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Eswatini

  1. 108 Bangladesh 7.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  2. 108 Japan 7.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  3. 108 Albania 7.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  4. 108 Belarus 7.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  5. 108 Burkina Faso 7.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  6. 108 Cape Verde 7.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  7. 108 Fiji 7.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  8. 108 Guyana 7.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  9. 108 Honduras 7.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  10. 108 Iceland 7.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  11. 108 Kuwait 7.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  12. 108 Liberia 7.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  13. 108 Oman 7.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  14. 108 Philippines 7.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  15. 108 Viet Nam 7.5 DB17-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 190 places β†’

More reference data data for Eswatini

All data for Eswatini β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Eswatini?
Enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Eswatini was 7.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) recorded in Eswatini?
The highest recorded value was 7.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) recorded in Eswatini?
The lowest recorded value was 7.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
How does Eswatini rank for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
Eswatini ranks 108th out of 190 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Eswatini data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Eswatini. Statizoid. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-18-db17-20-methodology/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-18-db17-20-methodology/eswatini/">Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Eswatini</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.