Statizoid

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Australia

Australia: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) was 15.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
15.5 DB17-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
4th
of 190 countries
All-time high
15.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
All-time low
15.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Australia, 2015–2019

0510152015201720192015: 15.5 DB17-20 methodology2016: 15.5 DB17-20 methodology2017: 15.5 DB17-20 methodology2018: 15.5 DB17-20 methodology2019: 15.5 DB17-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.

Analysis

In 2019, enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Australia stood at 15.5 DB17-20 methodology. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over five years.

Australia ranks 4th of 190 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

Countries ranked near Australia

  1. 1 China 16.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  2. 2 Kazakhstan 16 DB17-20 methodology compare
  3. 2 Rwanda 16 DB17-20 methodology compare
  4. 4 Singapore 15.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  5. 6 Lithuania 15 DB17-20 methodology compare
  6. 6 Türkiye 15 DB17-20 methodology compare
  7. 6 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 15 DB17-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Australia

All data for Australia →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Australia?
Enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Australia was 15.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) recorded in Australia?
The highest recorded value was 15.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) recorded in Australia?
The lowest recorded value was 15.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
How does Australia rank for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
Australia ranks 4th out of 190 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Australia data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Australia. Statizoid. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-18-db17-20-methodology/australia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-18-db17-20-methodology/australia/">Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Australia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.