Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Zambia

Zambia: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score was 56.25 in 2014. ▬ Flat

Latest (2014)
56.25
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
54th
of 184 countries
All-time high
56.25
in 2003
All-time low
56.25
in 2003
Years of data
12
2003–2014

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Zambia, 2003–2014

02040602003200820142003: 56.22004: 56.22005: 56.22006: 56.22007: 56.22008: 56.22009: 56.22010: 56.22011: 56.22012: 56.22013: 56.22014: 56.2

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Zambia is 56.25, measured in 2014. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Zambia peaked at 56.25 in 2003 and was at its lowest, 56.25, in 2003.

That places Zambia 54th out of 184 countries with data for 2014, putting it in the middle of the range.

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Zambia, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Zambia, 2003 to 2014.
Year Value Change
2003 56.25
2004 56.25 +0.0%
2005 56.25 +0.0%
2006 56.25 +0.0%
2007 56.25 +0.0%
2008 56.25 +0.0%
2009 56.25 +0.0%
2010 56.25 +0.0%
2011 56.25 +0.0%
2012 56.25 +0.0%
2013 56.25 +0.0%
2014 56.25 +0.0%

Zambia compared with similar countries

  • Zambia's 56.25 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 38.7, 1.5× the median. (46 countries reporting)
  • Zambia's 56.25 is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 42.19, 1.3× the median. (46 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 56.25 56.25 56.25 7
2010s 56.25 56.25 56.25 5

Countries ranked near Zambia

  1. 54 Russia 56.25 compare
  2. 54 Denmark 56.25 compare
  3. 54 El Salvador 56.25 compare
  4. 54 Estonia 56.25 compare
  5. 54 Israel 56.25 compare
  6. 54 Jamaica 56.25 compare
  7. 54 Tajikistan 56.25 compare
  8. 54 Turkey 56.25 compare

See the full ranking of 184 places →

More reference data data for Zambia

All data for Zambia →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Zambia?
Enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Zambia was 56.25 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score recorded in Zambia?
The highest recorded value was 56.25 in 2003.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score recorded in Zambia?
The lowest recorded value was 56.25 in 2003.
How does Zambia rank for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Zambia ranks 54th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
Is enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score rising or falling in Zambia?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Zambia data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Zambia. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-procedures-number-score/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-procedures-number-score/zambia/">Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Zambia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
184 places, 2,119 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.