Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in New Zealand

New Zealand: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score was 71.88 in 2014. ▬ Flat

Latest (2014)
71.88
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
19th
of 184 countries
All-time high
71.88
in 2003
All-time low
71.88
in 2003
Years of data
12
2003–2014

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in New Zealand, 2003–2014

0204060802003200820142003: 71.92004: 71.92005: 71.92006: 71.92007: 71.92008: 71.92009: 71.92010: 71.92011: 71.92012: 71.92013: 71.92014: 71.9

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2014, enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in New Zealand stood at 71.88. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in New Zealand peaked at 71.88 in 2003 and was at its lowest, 71.88, in 2003.

That places New Zealand 19th out of 184 countries with data for 2014, putting it in the top 10%.

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in New Zealand, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in New Zealand, 2003 to 2014.
Year Value Change
2003 71.88 —
2004 71.88 +0.0%
2005 71.88 +0.0%
2006 71.88 +0.0%
2007 71.88 +0.0%
2008 71.88 +0.0%
2009 71.88 +0.0%
2010 71.88 +0.0%
2011 71.88 +0.0%
2012 71.88 +0.0%
2013 71.88 +0.0%
2014 71.88 +0.0%

New Zealand compared with similar countries

  • New Zealand's 71.88 is above the median for high income countries, which is 59.38, 1.2× the median. (59 countries reporting)
  • New Zealand's 71.88 is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 53.12, 1.4× the median. (27 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 71.88 71.88 71.88 7
2010s 71.88 71.88 71.88 5

Countries ranked near New Zealand

  1. 19 Mozambique 71.88 compare
  2. 19 Ukraine 71.88 compare
  3. 19 Vanuatu 71.88 compare
  4. 19 Venezuela 71.88 compare

See the full ranking of 184 places →

More reference data data for New Zealand

All data for New Zealand →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in New Zealand?
Enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in New Zealand was 71.88 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score recorded in New Zealand?
The highest recorded value was 71.88 in 2003.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score recorded in New Zealand?
The lowest recorded value was 71.88 in 2003.
How does New Zealand rank for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
New Zealand ranks 19th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
Is enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score rising or falling in New Zealand?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this New Zealand data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in New Zealand. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-procedures-number-score/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-procedures-number-score/new-zealand/">Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in New Zealand</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
184 places, 2,119 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.