Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Kosovo

Kosovo: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score was 0 in 2014. ▬ Flat

Latest (2014)
0
Rank
1st
of 1 groups
All-time high
0
in 2009
All-time low
0
in 2009
Years of data
6
2009–2014

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Kosovo, 2009–2014

00.20.40.60.812009201120142009: 02010: 02011: 02012: 02013: 02014: 0

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2014, enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Kosovo stood at 0. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 0 0 0 1
2010s 0 0 0 5

Countries ranked near Kosovo

  1. 1 Ireland 100 compare
  2. 1 Singapore 100 compare
  3. 3 Rwanda 93.75 compare
  4. 4 Austria 87.5 compare

See the full ranking of 183 places →

More reference data data for Kosovo

All data for Kosovo →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Kosovo?
Enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Kosovo was 0 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score recorded in Kosovo?
The highest recorded value was 0 in 2009.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score recorded in Kosovo?
The lowest recorded value was 0 in 2009.
How does Kosovo rank for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Kosovo ranks 1st out of 1 groups with data for 2014.
Where does this Kosovo data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.