Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Georgia

Georgia: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score was 62.5 in 2014. ▲ Rising

Latest (2014)
62.5
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
37th
of 184 countries
All-time high
62.5
in 2012
All-time low
50
in 2003
Years of data
12
2003–2014

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Georgia, 2003–2014

02040602003200820142003: 502004: 502005: 502006: 53.12007: 53.12008: 53.12009: 53.12010: 53.12011: 53.12012: 62.52013: 62.52014: 62.5

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2014, enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Georgia stood at 62.5. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 25.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Georgia peaked at 62.5 in 2012 and was at its lowest, 50, in 2003.

That places Georgia 37th out of 184 countries with data for 2014, putting it in the top quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 12 years of available data.

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Georgia, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Georgia, 2003 to 2014.
Year Value Change
2003 50 —
2004 50 +0.0%
2005 50 +0.0%
2006 53.12 +6.2%
2007 53.12 +0.0%
2008 53.12 +0.0%
2009 53.12 +0.0%
2010 53.12 +0.0%
2011 53.12 +0.0%
2012 62.5 +17.6%
2013 62.5 +0.0%
2014 62.5 +0.0%

Georgia compared with similar countries

  • Georgia's 62.5 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 50, 1.2× the median. (55 countries reporting)
  • Georgia's 62.5 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 59.38, 1.1× the median. (48 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 51.79 50 53.12 7
2010s 58.75 53.12 62.5 5

Countries ranked near Georgia

  1. 37 Colombia 62.5 compare
  2. 37 Gambia 62.5 compare
  3. 37 Namibia 62.5 compare
  4. 37 Poland 62.5 compare
  5. 37 Slovakia 62.5 compare

See the full ranking of 184 places →

More reference data data for Georgia

All data for Georgia →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Georgia?
Enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Georgia was 62.5 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score recorded in Georgia?
The highest recorded value was 62.5 in 2012.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score recorded in Georgia?
The lowest recorded value was 50 in 2003.
How does Georgia rank for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Georgia ranks 37th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
Is enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score rising or falling in Georgia?
Over the last ten years it is up 25.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Georgia data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Georgia. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-procedures-number-score/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-procedures-number-score/georgia/">Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Georgia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
184 places, 2,119 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.