Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Fiji

Fiji: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score was 59.38 in 2014. ▬ Flat

Latest (2014)
59.38
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
44th
of 184 countries
All-time high
59.38
in 2003
All-time low
59.38
in 2003
Years of data
12
2003–2014

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Fiji, 2003–2014

02040602003200820142003: 59.42004: 59.42005: 59.42006: 59.42007: 59.42008: 59.42009: 59.42010: 59.42011: 59.42012: 59.42013: 59.42014: 59.4

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2014, enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Fiji stood at 59.38. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Fiji peaked at 59.38 in 2003 and was at its lowest, 59.38, in 2003.

Fiji ranks 44th of 184 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Fiji, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Fiji, 2003 to 2014.
Year Value Change
2003 59.38
2004 59.38 +0.0%
2005 59.38 +0.0%
2006 59.38 +0.0%
2007 59.38 +0.0%
2008 59.38 +0.0%
2009 59.38 +0.0%
2010 59.38 +0.0%
2011 59.38 +0.0%
2012 59.38 +0.0%
2013 59.38 +0.0%
2014 59.38 +0.0%

Fiji compared with similar countries

  • Fiji's 59.38 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 50, 1.2× the median. (55 countries reporting)
  • Fiji's 59.38 is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 53.12, 1.1× the median. (27 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 59.38 59.38 59.38 7
2010s 59.38 59.38 59.38 5

Countries ranked near Fiji

  1. 43 United States 60.62 compare
  2. 44 Dominican Republic 59.38 compare
  3. 44 Finland 59.38 compare
  4. 44 Haiti 59.38 compare
  5. 44 Hungary 59.38 compare
  6. 44 Mauritius 59.38 compare
  7. 44 Micronesia (country) 59.38 compare
  8. 44 Norway 59.38 compare
  9. 44 Portugal 59.38 compare
  10. 44 Romania 59.38 compare

See the full ranking of 184 places →

More reference data data for Fiji

All data for Fiji →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Fiji?
Enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Fiji was 59.38 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score recorded in Fiji?
The highest recorded value was 59.38 in 2003.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score recorded in Fiji?
The lowest recorded value was 59.38 in 2003.
How does Fiji rank for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Fiji ranks 44th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
Is enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score rising or falling in Fiji?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Fiji data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Fiji. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-procedures-number-score/fiji/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-procedures-number-score/fiji/">Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Fiji</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
184 places, 2,119 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.