Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Egypt

Egypt: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score was 34.38 in 2014. ▬ Flat

Latest (2014)
34.38
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
133rd
of 184 countries
All-time high
34.38
in 2003
All-time low
34.38
in 2003
Years of data
12
2003–2014

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Egypt, 2003–2014

01020302003200820142003: 34.42004: 34.42005: 34.42006: 34.42007: 34.42008: 34.42009: 34.42010: 34.42011: 34.42012: 34.42013: 34.42014: 34.4

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Egypt recorded 34.38 for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in 2014. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Egypt peaked at 34.38 in 2003 and was at its lowest, 34.38, in 2003.

Egypt ranks 133rd of 184 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Egypt, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Egypt, 2003 to 2014.
Year Value Change
2003 34.38 —
2004 34.38 +0.0%
2005 34.38 +0.0%
2006 34.38 +0.0%
2007 34.38 +0.0%
2008 34.38 +0.0%
2009 34.38 +0.0%
2010 34.38 +0.0%
2011 34.38 +0.0%
2012 34.38 +0.0%
2013 34.38 +0.0%
2014 34.38 +0.0%

Egypt compared with similar countries

  • Egypt's 34.38 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 38.7, 89% of the median. (46 countries reporting)
  • Egypt's 34.38 is above the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 31.25, 1.1× the median. (21 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 34.38 34.38 34.38 7
2010s 34.38 34.38 34.38 5

Countries ranked near Egypt

  1. 133 Cameroon 34.38 compare
  2. 133 Malawi 34.38 compare
  3. 133 Papua New Guinea 34.38 compare
  4. 133 Trinidad and Tobago 34.38 compare

See the full ranking of 184 places →

More reference data data for Egypt

All data for Egypt →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Egypt?
Enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Egypt was 34.38 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score recorded in Egypt?
The highest recorded value was 34.38 in 2003.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score recorded in Egypt?
The lowest recorded value was 34.38 in 2003.
How does Egypt rank for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Egypt ranks 133rd out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
Is enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score rising or falling in Egypt?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Egypt data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Egypt. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-procedures-number-score/egypt-arab-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-procedures-number-score/egypt-arab-rep/">Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Egypt</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
184 places, 2,119 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.