Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees in Nepal

Nepal: Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees was 3.0% in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
3.0%
Change on year
up 20.0%
World rank
101st
of 191 countries
All-time high
3.0%
in 2019
All-time low
2.5%
in 2011
Years of data
9
2011–2019

Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees in Nepal, 2011–2019

01232011201520192011: 2.5 % of claim2012: 2.5 % of claim2013: 2.5 % of claim2014: 2.5 % of claim2015: 2.5 % of claim2016: 2.5 % of claim2017: 2.5 % of claim2018: 2.5 % of claim2019: 3 % of claim

Source: World Bank. Measured in % of claim.

Analysis

Nepal recorded 3.0% for enforcing contracts: enforcement fees in 2019. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.

That represents a change of up 20.0% on the previous year and up 20.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: enforcement fees in Nepal peaked at 3.0% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 2.5%, in 2011.

Nepal ranks 101st of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees in Nepal, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees (% of claim) in Nepal, 2011 to 2019.
Year % of claim Change
2011 2.5% —
2012 2.5% +0.0%
2013 2.5% +0.0%
2014 2.5% +0.0%
2015 2.5% +0.0%
2016 2.5% +0.0%
2017 2.5% +0.0%
2018 2.5% +0.0%
2019 3.0% +20.0%

Nepal compared with similar countries

  • Nepal's 3.0% is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 5.5%, 55% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
  • Nepal's 3.0% is above the median for South Asia, which is 1.0%, 3.0× the median. (6 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Nepal

  1. 98 Iraq 3.3% compare
  2. 99 New Zealand 3.2% compare
  3. 99 Uruguay 3.2% compare
  4. 101 Belgium 3.0% compare
  5. 101 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3.0% compare
  6. 101 Brunei 3.0% compare
  7. 101 Bulgaria 3.0% compare
  8. 101 Eswatini 3.0% compare
  9. 101 Lebanon 3.0% compare
  10. 101 Liberia 3.0% compare
  11. 101 Mauritania 3.0% compare
  12. 101 South Africa 3.0% compare
  13. 101 Trinidad and Tobago 3.0% compare
  14. 101 Tunisia 3.0% compare
  15. 101 Vietnam 3.0% compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Nepal

All data for Nepal →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: enforcement fees in Nepal?
Enforcing contracts: enforcement fees in Nepal was 3.0% in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: enforcement fees recorded in Nepal?
The highest recorded value was 3.0% in 2019.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: enforcement fees recorded in Nepal?
The lowest recorded value was 2.5% in 2011.
How does Nepal rank for enforcing contracts: enforcement fees?
Nepal ranks 101st out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is enforcing contracts: enforcement fees rising or falling in Nepal?
Over the last ten years it is up 20.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Nepal data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees (% of claim). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees in Nepal. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-enforcement-fees-percent-of-claim/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-enforcement-fees-percent-of-claim/nepal/">Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees in Nepal</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Enforcement fees (% of claim)
Unit
% of claim
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,711 data points, 2011–2019
Last refreshed

The enforcement fees are all costs that plaintiff must advance to enforce the judgment through a public sale of defendant’s movable assets, regardless of the final cost borne by plaintiff.