How does Uganda rank for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?

Uganda ranks 71st out of 181 countries with data for 2014.

Is enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score rising or falling in Uganda?

Over the last ten years it is up 11.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.

Where does this Uganda data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Uganda

Name: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Uganda
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Uganda: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score was 60.48 in 2014. ▲ Rising

Latest (2014)

60.48

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

71st

of 181 countries

All-time high

60.48

in 2013

All-time low

54.16

in 2003

Years of data

2003–2014

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Uganda, 2003–2014

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2014, enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Uganda stood at 60.48. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.

That represents a change of up 11.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Uganda peaked at 60.48 in 2013 and was at its lowest, 54.16, in 2003.

That places Uganda 71st out of 181 countries with data for 2014, putting it in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 12 years of available data.

Averages by decade

Decade	Average	Lowest	Highest	Years
2000s	54.25	54.16	54.84	7
2010s	57.42	55.38	60.48	5

Countries ranked near Uganda

68 Vanuatu 61.2 compare
69 Tunisia 60.96 compare
70 Canada 60.75 compare
72 Morocco 59.65 compare
73 Portugal 59.55 compare
74 Haiti 59.32 compare

See the full ranking of 183 places →

More reference data data for Uganda

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.36 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 5.95 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 7.86 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.4214 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 7.86 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.57 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 5.13 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 29.65 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 42.22 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.29 (2050)

All data for Uganda →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Uganda?: Enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Uganda was 60.48 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score recorded in Uganda?: The highest recorded value was 60.48 in 2013.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score recorded in Uganda?: The lowest recorded value was 54.16 in 2003.
How does Uganda rank for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?: Uganda ranks 71st out of 181 countries with data for 2014.
Is enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score rising or falling in Uganda?: Over the last ten years it is up 11.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Uganda data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.