Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Argentina
Argentina: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score was 52.07 in 2014. ▼ Falling
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Argentina, 2003–2014
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
In 2014, enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Argentina stood at 52.07. That is the lowest value across all 12 years on record.
The figure is down 1.4% on the previous year and down 20.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Argentina peaked at 65.38 in 2003 and was at its lowest, 52.07, in 2014.
Argentina ranks 116th of 184 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 12 years of available data.
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Argentina, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 65.38 | — |
| 2004 | 65.38 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 65.38 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 65.38 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 65.38 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 65.38 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 65.38 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 65.38 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 65.38 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 57.94 | -11.4% |
| 2013 | 52.82 | -8.8% |
| 2014 | 52.07 | -1.4% |
Argentina compared with similar countries
- Argentina's 52.07 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 57.62, 90% of the median. (55 countries reporting)
- Argentina's 52.07 is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 54.47, 96% of the median. (32 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 65.38 | 65.38 | 65.38 | 7 |
| 2010s | 58.72 | 52.07 | 65.38 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Argentina
- 113 Slovenia 52.4 compare
- 114 Bahrain 52.33 compare
- 115 United Arab Emirates 52.18 compare
- 117 Djibouti 51.79 compare
- 118 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 51.74 compare
- 119 Saint Kitts and Nevis 51.51 compare
More reference data data for Argentina
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.56 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 20.99 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 37.41 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 5.76 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 37.41 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 5.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.69 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 111.77 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 187.7 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 31.35 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Argentina?
- Enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Argentina was 52.07 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score recorded in Argentina?
- The highest recorded value was 65.38 in 2003.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score recorded in Argentina?
- The lowest recorded value was 52.07 in 2014.
- How does Argentina rank for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Argentina ranks 116th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
- Is enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score rising or falling in Argentina?
- Over the last ten years it is down 20.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Argentina data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.