Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) in Norway

Norway: Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) was 4 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
4 DB17-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
1st
of 191 countries
All-time high
4 DB17-20 methodology
in 2017
All-time low
2 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) in Norway, 2015–2019

012342015201720192015: 2 DB17-20 methodology2016: 3 DB17-20 methodology2017: 4 DB17-20 methodology2018: 4 DB17-20 methodology2019: 4 DB17-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.

Analysis

The most recent figure for enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) in Norway is 4 DB17-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 100.0% over five years.

That places Norway 1st out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.

Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) in Norway, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology) in Norway, 2015 to 2019.
Year DB17-20 methodology Change
2015 2 DB17-20 methodology —
2016 3 DB17-20 methodology +50.0%
2017 4 DB17-20 methodology +33.3%
2018 4 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%
2019 4 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%

Norway compared with similar countries

  • Norway's 4 DB17-20 methodology is above the median for high income countries, which is 2 DB17-20 methodology, 2.0× the median. (62 countries reporting)
  • Norway's 4 DB17-20 methodology is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 2 DB17-20 methodology, 2.0× the median. (49 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Norway

  1. 1 Estonia 4 DB17-20 methodology compare
  2. 1 South Korea 4 DB17-20 methodology compare
  3. 1 Lithuania 4 DB17-20 methodology compare
  4. 1 Rwanda 4 DB17-20 methodology compare
  5. 1 Singapore 4 DB17-20 methodology compare
  6. 1 Slovakia 4 DB17-20 methodology compare
  7. 1 Turkey 4 DB17-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Norway

All data for Norway →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) in Norway?
Enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) in Norway was 4 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) recorded in Norway?
The highest recorded value was 4 DB17-20 methodology in 2017.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) recorded in Norway?
The lowest recorded value was 2 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
How does Norway rank for enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4)?
Norway ranks 1st out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Norway data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) in Norway. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-court-automation-0-4-db17-20-methodology/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-court-automation-0-4-db17-20-methodology/norway/">Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) in Norway</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 955 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The court automation evaluates four aspects: (i) whether the initial complaint can be filed electronically; (ii) whether the initial complaint can be served electronically; (iii) whether court fees can be paid electronically; and (iv) whether judgments rendered in commercial matters are made available to the public. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.