Statizoid

Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) in Finland

Finland: Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) was 2.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
2.5 DB17-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
25th
of 188 countries
All-time high
2.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
All-time low
2.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) in Finland, 2015–2019

00.511.522.52015201720192015: 2.5 DB17-20 methodology2016: 2.5 DB17-20 methodology2017: 2.5 DB17-20 methodology2018: 2.5 DB17-20 methodology2019: 2.5 DB17-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.

Analysis

Finland recorded 2.5 DB17-20 methodology for enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over five years.

That places Finland 25th out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top quarter.

Countries ranked near Finland

  1. 25 Azerbaijan 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  2. 25 Brunei Darussalam 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  3. 25 Georgia 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  4. 25 Hungary 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  5. 25 Malaysia 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  6. 25 Portugal 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  7. 25 Puerto Rico (US) 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  8. 25 Spain 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  9. 25 Switzerland 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Finland

All data for Finland →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) in Finland?
Enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) in Finland was 2.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) recorded in Finland?
The highest recorded value was 2.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) recorded in Finland?
The lowest recorded value was 2.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
How does Finland rank for enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4)?
Finland ranks 25th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Finland data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The court automation evaluates four aspects: (i) whether the initial complaint can be filed electronically; (ii) whether the initial complaint can be served electronically; (iii) whether court fees can be paid electronically; and (iv) whether judgments rendered in commercial matters are made available to the public. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.