Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) in Australia
Australia: Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) was 3 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) in Australia, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.
Analysis
In 2019, enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) in Australia stood at 3 DB17-20 methodology. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over five years.
That places Australia 13th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.
Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) in Australia, year by year
| Year | DB17-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 3 DB17-20 methodology | — |
| 2016 | 3 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 3 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 3 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 3 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Australia compared with similar countries
- Australia's 3 DB17-20 methodology is above the median for high income countries, which is 2 DB17-20 methodology, 1.5× the median. (62 countries reporting)
- Australia's 3 DB17-20 methodology is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 1 DB17-20 methodology, 3.0× the median. (28 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Australia
- 13 China 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 13 United States 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 13 Brazil 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 13 Canada 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 13 Czechia 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 13 Israel 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 13 Italy 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 13 Kazakhstan 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 13 Mauritius 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 13 Taiwan 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 13 United Arab Emirates 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Australia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.21 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 28.02 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 38.41 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.55 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 38.41 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.07 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 6.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 118.71 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 170.29 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 13.9 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) in Australia?
- Enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) in Australia was 3 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) recorded in Australia?
- The highest recorded value was 3 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) recorded in Australia?
- The lowest recorded value was 3 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
- How does Australia rank for enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4)?
- Australia ranks 13th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Australia data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The court automation evaluates four aspects: (i) whether the initial complaint can be filed electronically; (ii) whether the initial complaint can be served electronically; (iii) whether court fees can be paid electronically; and (iv) whether judgments rendered in commercial matters are made available to the public. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.