What is enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Libya?

Enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Libya was 69.7% in 2019, according to the World Bank.

What is the highest enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score recorded in Libya?

The highest recorded value was 69.7% in 2012.

What is the lowest enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score recorded in Libya?

The lowest recorded value was 69.7% in 2012.

How does Libya rank for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?

Libya ranks 88th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.

Is enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score rising or falling in Libya?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Libya data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Libya

Name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Libya
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Libya: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score was 69.7% in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

69.7%

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

88th

of 188 countries

All-time high

69.7%

in 2012

All-time low

69.7%

in 2012

Years of data

2012–2019

Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Libya, 2012–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Libya stood at 69.7%. That is the highest value across all 8 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Libya ranks 88th of 188 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Libya

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Libya

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to 56.6 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural Soil 2,049 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure Management 139.01 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Crop Residues 30.32 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on Pa 1,541 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure Management 23.14 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 7.73 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation 2,614 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 4,806 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 0.8811 (2050)

All data for Libya →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Libya?: Enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Libya was 69.7% in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score recorded in Libya?: The highest recorded value was 69.7% in 2012.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score recorded in Libya?: The lowest recorded value was 69.7% in 2012.
How does Libya rank for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?: Libya ranks 88th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score rising or falling in Libya?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Libya data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 8 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.