Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) in Sweden
Sweden: Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) was 4 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) in Sweden, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.
Analysis
In 2019, enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) in Sweden stood at 4 DB16-20 methodology. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over five years.
That places Sweden 18th out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.
Countries ranked near Sweden
- 18 Russia 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 18 Argentina 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 18 Austria 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 18 Brunei 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 18 Hungary 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 18 Italy 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 18 South Korea 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 18 Malaysia 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 18 Malta 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 18 Norway 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 18 Romania 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 18 Slovakia 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 18 United Arab Emirates 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Sweden
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4328 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.2237 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.68 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2063 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.68 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.45 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.9766 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.13 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 8.03 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.12 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) in Sweden?
- Enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) in Sweden was 4 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) recorded in Sweden?
- The highest recorded value was 4 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) recorded in Sweden?
- The lowest recorded value was 4 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
- How does Sweden rank for enforcing contracts: case management (0-6)?
- Sweden ranks 18th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Sweden data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The case management evaluates six aspects of the court case management system: (i) whether there are regulations setting time standards for key court events; (ii) whether there are regulations on adjournments and continuances; (iii) whether performance measurement reports are publicly available; (iv) whether a pretrial conference is available; (v) whether an electronic case management system for judges is available; and (vi) whether an electronic case management system for lawyers is available. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.