Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per in Uruguay
Uruguay: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per was 0 units per square kilometre in 2019. ▲ Rising
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per in Uruguay, 1961–2019
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
Uruguay recorded 0 units per square kilometre for emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - agricultural soils, per in 2019.
The figure is up 0.3% on the previous year and down 1.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - agricultural soils, per in Uruguay peaked at 0 units per square kilometre in 2012 and was at its lowest, 0 units per square kilometre, in 1972.
That places Uruguay 35th out of 193 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 59 years of available data.
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per in Uruguay, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0 units per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 1963 | 0 units per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 1964 | 0 units per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 1965 | 0 units per square kilometre | -3.9% |
| 1966 | 0 units per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1967 | 0 units per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 1968 | 0 units per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1969 | 0 units per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1970 | 0 units per square kilometre | -6.6% |
| 1971 | 0 units per square kilometre | -2.9% |
| 1972 | 0 units per square kilometre | -1.4% |
| 1973 | 0 units per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 1974 | 0 units per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1975 | 0 units per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 1976 | 0 units per square kilometre | -4.5% |
| 1977 | 0 units per square kilometre | -1.5% |
| 1978 | 0 units per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 1979 | 0 units per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 1980 | 0 units per square kilometre | +10.2% |
| 1981 | 0 units per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1982 | 0 units per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 1983 | 0 units per square kilometre | -8.6% |
| 1984 | 0 units per square kilometre | -3.2% |
| 1985 | 0 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1986 | 0 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1987 | 0 units per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 1988 | 0 units per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 1989 | 0 units per square kilometre | -4.7% |
| 1990 | 0 units per square kilometre | -3.4% |
| 1991 | 0 units per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 1992 | 0 units per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1993 | 0 units per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 1994 | 0 units per square kilometre | -2.5% |
| 1995 | 0 units per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 1996 | 0 units per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 1997 | 0 units per square kilometre | -2.8% |
| 1998 | 0 units per square kilometre | -3.3% |
| 1999 | 0 units per square kilometre | -3.8% |
| 2000 | 0 units per square kilometre | -4.0% |
| 2001 | 0 units per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 2002 | 0 units per square kilometre | -2.5% |
| 2003 | 0 units per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 2004 | 0 units per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2005 | 0 units per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2006 | 0 units per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 2007 | 0 units per square kilometre | -2.4% |
| 2008 | 0 units per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 2009 | 0 units per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 2010 | 0 units per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 2011 | 0 units per square kilometre | -1.5% |
| 2012 | 0 units per square kilometre | +7.8% |
| 2013 | 0 units per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 2014 | 0 units per square kilometre | -1.9% |
| 2015 | 0 units per square kilometre | -6.8% |
| 2016 | 0 units per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 2017 | 0 units per square kilometre | -1.1% |
| 2018 | 0 units per square kilometre | -2.0% |
| 2019 | 0 units per square kilometre | +0.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 10 |
Countries ranked near Uruguay
- 32 Republic of Korea 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 33 Azerbaijan 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 34 Malawi 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 36 Nepal 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 37 Trinidad and Tobago 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 38 Türkiye 0 units per square kilometre compare
More reference data data for Uruguay
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2999 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 4.87 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 6.98 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3685 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 6.98 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.2195 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 24.48 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 33.62 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.01 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - agricultural soils, per in Uruguay?
- Emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - agricultural soils, per in Uruguay was 0 units per square kilometre in 2019, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - agricultural soils, per recorded in Uruguay?
- The highest recorded value was 0 units per square kilometre in 2012.
- What is the lowest emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - agricultural soils, per recorded in Uruguay?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 units per square kilometre in 1972.
- How does Uruguay rank for emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - agricultural soils, per?
- Uruguay ranks 35th out of 193 countries with data for 2019.
- Is emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - agricultural soils, per rising or falling in Uruguay?
- Over the last ten years it is down 1.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Uruguay data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 59 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.