Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per in Chile
Chile: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per was 0 units per square kilometre in 2019. ▲ Rising
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per in Chile, 1961–2019
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
Chile recorded 0 units per square kilometre for emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - agricultural soils, per in 2019.
The figure is up 2.2% on the previous year and down 14.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - agricultural soils, per in Chile peaked at 0 units per square kilometre in 2008 and was at its lowest, 0 units per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Chile 156th out of 193 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 59 years of available data.
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per in Chile, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1963 | 0 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1965 | 0 units per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 1966 | 0 units per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1967 | 0 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1968 | 0 units per square kilometre | -3.3% |
| 1969 | 0 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 0 units per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1971 | 0 units per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 1972 | 0 units per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 1973 | 0 units per square kilometre | -0.9% |
| 1974 | 0 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1975 | 0 units per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 1976 | 0 units per square kilometre | -0.9% |
| 1977 | 0 units per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 1978 | 0 units per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1979 | 0 units per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 1980 | 0 units per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 1981 | 0 units per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 1982 | 0 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1984 | 0 units per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1985 | 0 units per square kilometre | -1.4% |
| 1986 | 0 units per square kilometre | +8.1% |
| 1987 | 0 units per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1988 | 0 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1989 | 0 units per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 1990 | 0 units per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 1991 | 0 units per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 1992 | 0 units per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 1993 | 0 units per square kilometre | +5.5% |
| 1994 | 0 units per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 1995 | 0 units per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 1996 | 0 units per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1997 | 0 units per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 1998 | 0 units per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 1999 | 0 units per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 2000 | 0 units per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 2001 | 0 units per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 2002 | 0 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 2003 | 0 units per square kilometre | -4.0% |
| 2004 | 0 units per square kilometre | +13.0% |
| 2005 | 0 units per square kilometre | -6.4% |
| 2006 | 0 units per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 2007 | 0 units per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 2008 | 0 units per square kilometre | +11.2% |
| 2009 | 0 units per square kilometre | -6.5% |
| 2010 | 0 units per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 2011 | 0 units per square kilometre | -8.2% |
| 2012 | 0 units per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 2013 | 0 units per square kilometre | -5.1% |
| 2014 | 0 units per square kilometre | -1.1% |
| 2015 | 0 units per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 2016 | 0 units per square kilometre | -8.4% |
| 2017 | 0 units per square kilometre | -2.0% |
| 2018 | 0 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2019 | 0 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 10 |
Countries ranked near Chile
- 153 Naoero 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 154 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 155 Peru 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 157 Sweden 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 158 Turkmenistan 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 159 Finland 0 units per square kilometre compare
More reference data data for Chile
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9268 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.22 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.33 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2204 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 5.33 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.11 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.46 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 11.45 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 25.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.2 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - agricultural soils, per in Chile?
- Emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - agricultural soils, per in Chile was 0 units per square kilometre in 2019, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - agricultural soils, per recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 0 units per square kilometre in 2008.
- What is the lowest emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - agricultural soils, per recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 units per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Chile rank for emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - agricultural soils, per?
- Chile ranks 156th out of 193 countries with data for 2019.
- Is emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - agricultural soils, per rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is down 14.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 59 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.