Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers, per square in Costa Rica

Costa Rica: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers, per square was 0 units per square kilometre in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
0 units per square kilometre
Change on year
down 0.9%
World rank
36th
of 163 countries
All-time high
0 units per square kilometre
in 1998
All-time low
0 units per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
59
1961–2019

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers, per square in Costa Rica, 1961–2019

00000196119902019

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.

Analysis

In 2019, emission totals - emissions (n2o) - synthetic fertilizers, per square in Costa Rica stood at 0 units per square kilometre.

The figure is down 0.9% on the previous year and up 110.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, emission totals - emissions (n2o) - synthetic fertilizers, per square in Costa Rica peaked at 0 units per square kilometre in 1998 and was at its lowest, 0 units per square kilometre, in 1961.

That places Costa Rica 36th out of 163 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 59 years of available data.

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers, per square in Costa Rica, year by year

Annual values for Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers, per square kilometre in Costa Rica, 1961 to 2019.
Year units per square kilometre Change
1961 0 units per square kilometre
1962 0 units per square kilometre +41.9%
1963 0 units per square kilometre +137.8%
1964 0 units per square kilometre +14.3%
1965 0 units per square kilometre -58.3%
1966 0 units per square kilometre +67.0%
1967 0 units per square kilometre -6.0%
1968 0 units per square kilometre +84.7%
1969 0 units per square kilometre +37.9%
1970 0 units per square kilometre -6.5%
1971 0 units per square kilometre -28.3%
1972 0 units per square kilometre -3.4%
1973 0 units per square kilometre +31.3%
1974 0 units per square kilometre -0.3%
1975 0 units per square kilometre -8.3%
1976 0 units per square kilometre -8.4%
1977 0 units per square kilometre +42.3%
1978 0 units per square kilometre +0.8%
1979 0 units per square kilometre -3.6%
1980 0 units per square kilometre +2.8%
1981 0 units per square kilometre +11.6%
1982 0 units per square kilometre +8.4%
1983 0 units per square kilometre +10.2%
1984 0 units per square kilometre -6.3%
1985 0 units per square kilometre -3.2%
1986 0 units per square kilometre +6.1%
1987 0 units per square kilometre +5.8%
1988 0 units per square kilometre +7.2%
1989 0 units per square kilometre +6.8%
1990 0 units per square kilometre -11.7%
1991 0 units per square kilometre +12.2%
1992 0 units per square kilometre +4.2%
1993 0 units per square kilometre -7.7%
1994 0 units per square kilometre +16.7%
1995 0 units per square kilometre +0.0%
1996 0 units per square kilometre +27.1%
1997 0 units per square kilometre +12.4%
1998 0 units per square kilometre +4.0%
1999 0 units per square kilometre -23.1%
2000 0 units per square kilometre -15.0%
2001 0 units per square kilometre -21.7%
2002 0 units per square kilometre +3.2%
2003 0 units per square kilometre +40.9%
2004 0 units per square kilometre -18.5%
2005 0 units per square kilometre +7.8%
2006 0 units per square kilometre +5.2%
2007 0 units per square kilometre +3.7%
2008 0 units per square kilometre +10.0%
2009 0 units per square kilometre -44.4%
2010 0 units per square kilometre +34.9%
2011 0 units per square kilometre +54.6%
2012 0 units per square kilometre -7.1%
2013 0 units per square kilometre +2.4%
2014 0 units per square kilometre -13.4%
2015 0 units per square kilometre +9.9%
2016 0 units per square kilometre +15.5%
2017 0 units per square kilometre -8.3%
2018 0 units per square kilometre +6.0%
2019 0 units per square kilometre -0.9%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 9
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 10
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 10
1990s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 10
2000s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 10
2010s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 10

Countries ranked near Costa Rica

  1. 33 Italy 0 units per square kilometre compare
  2. 34 Lebanon 0 units per square kilometre compare
  3. 35 Belarus 0 units per square kilometre compare
  4. 37 New Zealand 0 units per square kilometre compare
  5. 38 Uzbekistan 0 units per square kilometre compare
  6. 39 Indonesia 0 units per square kilometre compare

See the full ranking of 163 places →

More reference data data for Costa Rica

All data for Costa Rica →

Frequently asked questions

What is emission totals - emissions (n2o) - synthetic fertilizers, per square in Costa Rica?
Emission totals - emissions (n2o) - synthetic fertilizers, per square in Costa Rica was 0 units per square kilometre in 2019, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest emission totals - emissions (n2o) - synthetic fertilizers, per square recorded in Costa Rica?
The highest recorded value was 0 units per square kilometre in 1998.
What is the lowest emission totals - emissions (n2o) - synthetic fertilizers, per square recorded in Costa Rica?
The lowest recorded value was 0 units per square kilometre in 1961.
How does Costa Rica rank for emission totals - emissions (n2o) - synthetic fertilizers, per square?
Costa Rica ranks 36th out of 163 countries with data for 2019.
Is emission totals - emissions (n2o) - synthetic fertilizers, per square rising or falling in Costa Rica?
Over the last ten years it is up 110.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Costa Rica data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 59 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers, per square in Costa Rica. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/emission-totals-emissions-n2o-synthetic-fertilizers-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/emission-totals-emissions-n2o-synthetic-fertilizers-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/">Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers, per square in Costa Rica</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers ÷ Land area (sq. km)

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
163 places, 8,046 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.