Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils, annual in Cuba
Cuba: Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils, annual was 1.3 % change on previous year in 2019. ◆ Volatile
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils, annual in Cuba, 1962–2019
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
The most recent figure for emission totals - emissions (n2o) - manure applied to soils, annual in Cuba is 1.3 % change on previous year, measured in 2019.
The figure is down 81.6% on the previous year and up 549.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, emission totals - emissions (n2o) - manure applied to soils, annual in Cuba peaked at 11.62 % change on previous year in 1992 and was at its lowest, -22.18 % change on previous year, in 1989.
Cuba ranks 71st of 193 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils, annual in Cuba, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1962 | 7.08 % change on previous year | — |
| 1963 | 8.38 % change on previous year | +18.3% |
| 1964 | 8.4 % change on previous year | +0.2% |
| 1965 | 7.48 % change on previous year | -10.9% |
| 1966 | 4.07 % change on previous year | -45.7% |
| 1967 | 5.56 % change on previous year | +36.6% |
| 1968 | -6.87 % change on previous year | -223.6% |
| 1969 | -4.76 % change on previous year | -30.6% |
| 1970 | -3.25 % change on previous year | -31.8% |
| 1971 | -1.3 % change on previous year | -60.0% |
| 1972 | -0.9854 % change on previous year | -24.2% |
| 1973 | 2.1 % change on previous year | -313.0% |
| 1974 | 1.99 % change on previous year | -5.3% |
| 1975 | 1.18 % change on previous year | -40.5% |
| 1976 | 1.46 % change on previous year | +23.3% |
| 1977 | 3.73 % change on previous year | +155.9% |
| 1978 | -2.38 % change on previous year | -163.8% |
| 1979 | 3.17 % change on previous year | -233.0% |
| 1980 | 1.9 % change on previous year | -40.1% |
| 1981 | -1.59 % change on previous year | -184.0% |
| 1982 | 1.83 % change on previous year | -214.9% |
| 1983 | 1.2 % change on previous year | -34.4% |
| 1984 | 0.7599 % change on previous year | -36.7% |
| 1985 | 2.67 % change on previous year | +251.3% |
| 1986 | 0.8171 % change on previous year | -69.4% |
| 1987 | 4.1 % change on previous year | +402.0% |
| 1988 | 2.7 % change on previous year | -34.2% |
| 1989 | -22.18 % change on previous year | -922.4% |
| 1990 | 2.99 % change on previous year | -113.5% |
| 1991 | 8.66 % change on previous year | +189.4% |
| 1992 | 11.62 % change on previous year | +34.3% |
| 1993 | 0.7484 % change on previous year | -93.6% |
| 1994 | 2.35 % change on previous year | +213.4% |
| 1995 | -5.37 % change on previous year | -329.0% |
| 1996 | -4.09 % change on previous year | -23.9% |
| 1997 | -17.17 % change on previous year | +320.3% |
| 1998 | 8.27 % change on previous year | -148.2% |
| 1999 | 4.91 % change on previous year | -40.7% |
| 2000 | -1.03 % change on previous year | -121.0% |
| 2001 | -9.81 % change on previous year | +853.3% |
| 2002 | 5.43 % change on previous year | -155.4% |
| 2003 | 3.75 % change on previous year | -31.1% |
| 2004 | -7.22 % change on previous year | -292.8% |
| 2005 | -4.66 % change on previous year | -35.4% |
| 2006 | 5.08 % change on previous year | -208.9% |
| 2007 | 5.05 % change on previous year | -0.6% |
| 2008 | 0.6851 % change on previous year | -86.4% |
| 2009 | -0.289 % change on previous year | -142.2% |
| 2010 | -2.98 % change on previous year | +932.0% |
| 2011 | -4.66 % change on previous year | +56.4% |
| 2012 | -0.7985 % change on previous year | -82.9% |
| 2013 | 4.8 % change on previous year | -701.0% |
| 2014 | 0.7291 % change on previous year | -84.8% |
| 2015 | 2.02 % change on previous year | +176.6% |
| 2016 | 3.79 % change on previous year | +88.1% |
| 2017 | -0.948 % change on previous year | -125.0% |
| 2018 | 7.05 % change on previous year | -843.6% |
| 2019 | 1.3 % change on previous year | -81.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.67 % change on previous year | -6.87 % change on previous year | 8.4 % change on previous year | 8 |
| 1970s | 0.5711 % change on previous year | -3.25 % change on previous year | 3.73 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | -0.7804 % change on previous year | -22.18 % change on previous year | 4.1 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.29 % change on previous year | -17.17 % change on previous year | 11.62 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | -0.3022 % change on previous year | -9.81 % change on previous year | 5.43 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.03 % change on previous year | -4.66 % change on previous year | 7.05 % change on previous year | 10 |
Countries ranked near Cuba
- 68 Cameroon 1.48 % change on previous year compare
- 69 Portugal 1.41 % change on previous year compare
- 70 Vanuatu 1.37 % change on previous year compare
- 72 Ethiopia 1.26 % change on previous year compare
- 73 Bahrain 1.22 % change on previous year compare
- 74 Barbados 1.22 % change on previous year compare
More reference data data for Cuba
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.529 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.8 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0696 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.8 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.77 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.9214 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 9.19 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3791 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is emission totals - emissions (n2o) - manure applied to soils, annual in Cuba?
- Emission totals - emissions (n2o) - manure applied to soils, annual in Cuba was 1.3 % change on previous year in 2019, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest emission totals - emissions (n2o) - manure applied to soils, annual recorded in Cuba?
- The highest recorded value was 11.62 % change on previous year in 1992.
- What is the lowest emission totals - emissions (n2o) - manure applied to soils, annual recorded in Cuba?
- The lowest recorded value was -22.18 % change on previous year in 1989.
- How does Cuba rank for emission totals - emissions (n2o) - manure applied to soils, annual?
- Cuba ranks 71st out of 193 countries with data for 2019.
- Is emission totals - emissions (n2o) - manure applied to soils, annual rising or falling in Cuba?
- Over the last ten years it is up 549.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Cuba data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 58 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.