Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied in Costa Rica
Costa Rica: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied was 0.0049 units per square kilometre in 2019. ▲ Rising
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied in Costa Rica, 1961–2019
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - manure applied in Costa Rica is 0.0049 units per square kilometre, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 59 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.4% on the previous year and up 21.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - manure applied in Costa Rica peaked at 0.0049 units per square kilometre in 2019 and was at its lowest, 0.0009 units per square kilometre, in 1962.
That places Costa Rica 37th out of 190 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 59 years of available data.
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied in Costa Rica, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0009 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0009 units per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 1963 | 0.0009 units per square kilometre | +10.5% |
| 1964 | 0.001 units per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 1965 | 0.001 units per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 1966 | 0.001 units per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1967 | 0.0011 units per square kilometre | +8.5% |
| 1968 | 0.0012 units per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 1969 | 0.0013 units per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 1970 | 0.0013 units per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 1971 | 0.0014 units per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 1972 | 0.0015 units per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 1973 | 0.0015 units per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 1974 | 0.0015 units per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1975 | 0.0016 units per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 1976 | 0.0016 units per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 1977 | 0.0017 units per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 1978 | 0.0018 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1979 | 0.0018 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1980 | 0.0018 units per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 1981 | 0.0018 units per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 1982 | 0.0017 units per square kilometre | -8.3% |
| 1983 | 0.0018 units per square kilometre | +7.9% |
| 1984 | 0.0018 units per square kilometre | -2.4% |
| 1985 | 0.0018 units per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1986 | 0.0018 units per square kilometre | -2.3% |
| 1987 | 0.0018 units per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 1988 | 0.002 units per square kilometre | +11.8% |
| 1989 | 0.002 units per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1990 | 0.0021 units per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 1991 | 0.0022 units per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 1992 | 0.0023 units per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1993 | 0.0025 units per square kilometre | +7.3% |
| 1994 | 0.0025 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1995 | 0.0026 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1996 | 0.0026 units per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 1997 | 0.0028 units per square kilometre | +6.5% |
| 1998 | 0.003 units per square kilometre | +9.5% |
| 1999 | 0.003 units per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 2000 | 0.0031 units per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 2001 | 0.0031 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 2002 | 0.0033 units per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 2003 | 0.0034 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 2004 | 0.0034 units per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 2005 | 0.0034 units per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 2006 | 0.0036 units per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 2007 | 0.004 units per square kilometre | +9.6% |
| 2008 | 0.004 units per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 2009 | 0.004 units per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 2010 | 0.0033 units per square kilometre | -17.1% |
| 2011 | 0.0042 units per square kilometre | +26.0% |
| 2012 | 0.0042 units per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 2013 | 0.0045 units per square kilometre | +7.4% |
| 2014 | 0.0046 units per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 2015 | 0.0047 units per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 2016 | 0.0048 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 2017 | 0.0048 units per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 2018 | 0.0049 units per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 2019 | 0.0049 units per square kilometre | +0.4% |
Costa Rica compared with similar countries
- Costa Rica's 0.0049 units per square kilometre is above the median for high income countries, which is 0.0033 units per square kilometre, 1.5× the median. (65 countries reporting)
- Costa Rica's 0.0049 units per square kilometre is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.0021 units per square kilometre, 2.3× the median. (34 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied in Costa Rica changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | +26.0% | 0.0033 units per square kilometre | 0.0042 units per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.001 units per square kilometre | 0.0009 units per square kilometre | 0.0013 units per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0016 units per square kilometre | 0.0013 units per square kilometre | 0.0018 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0018 units per square kilometre | 0.0017 units per square kilometre | 0.002 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0026 units per square kilometre | 0.0021 units per square kilometre | 0.003 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0035 units per square kilometre | 0.0031 units per square kilometre | 0.004 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0045 units per square kilometre | 0.0033 units per square kilometre | 0.0049 units per square kilometre | 10 |
Countries ranked near Costa Rica
- 34 Hong Kong 0.0051 units per square kilometre compare
- 35 Rwanda 0.0051 units per square kilometre compare
- 36 Haiti 0.0051 units per square kilometre compare
- 38 Moldova 0.0048 units per square kilometre compare
- 39 Lebanon 0.0048 units per square kilometre compare
- 40 Serbia 0.0048 units per square kilometre compare
More reference data data for Costa Rica
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2987 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.406 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0167 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.3161 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.91 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0907 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - manure applied in Costa Rica?
- Emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - manure applied in Costa Rica was 0.0049 units per square kilometre in 2019, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - manure applied recorded in Costa Rica?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0049 units per square kilometre in 2019.
- What is the lowest emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - manure applied recorded in Costa Rica?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0009 units per square kilometre in 1962.
- How does Costa Rica rank for emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - manure applied?
- Costa Rica ranks 37th out of 190 countries with data for 2019.
- Is emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - manure applied rising or falling in Costa Rica?
- Over the last ten years it is up 21.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Costa Rica data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to Soils, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 59 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to Soils divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to Soils ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to Soils divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.