Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC in Equatorial Guinea
Equatorial Guinea: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2019. ◆ Volatile
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC in Equatorial Guinea, 1962–2019
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
In 2019, emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5) - ipcc in Equatorial Guinea stood at 0 units per US$ of GDP.
The figure is up 15.7% on the previous year and up 41.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5) - ipcc in Equatorial Guinea peaked at 0 units per US$ of GDP in 1981 and was at its lowest, 0 units per US$ of GDP, in 2012.
That places Equatorial Guinea 182nd out of 202 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC in Equatorial Guinea, year by year
| Year | units per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1962 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1963 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -18.7% |
| 1964 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -16.8% |
| 1965 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -12.8% |
| 1966 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -2.8% |
| 1967 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -1.9% |
| 1968 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +6.2% |
| 1969 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +2.8% |
| 1970 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +4.3% |
| 1971 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +5.0% |
| 1972 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +1.2% |
| 1973 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -17.5% |
| 1974 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -8.4% |
| 1975 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -6.8% |
| 1976 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -2.3% |
| 1977 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +2.3% |
| 1980 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +110.9% |
| 1981 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +39.7% |
| 1982 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -16.6% |
| 1983 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +1.1% |
| 1984 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -10.7% |
| 1985 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -18.7% |
| 1986 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -18.1% |
| 1987 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -17.4% |
| 1988 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -6.4% |
| 1989 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +14.9% |
| 1990 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -20.5% |
| 1991 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +1.9% |
| 1992 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -16.9% |
| 1993 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -0.1% |
| 1994 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +35.5% |
| 1995 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -28.2% |
| 1996 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -38.8% |
| 1997 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -47.0% |
| 1998 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +19.9% |
| 1999 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -39.8% |
| 2000 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -40.3% |
| 2001 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -27.8% |
| 2002 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -19.2% |
| 2003 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -27.0% |
| 2004 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -43.5% |
| 2005 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -46.2% |
| 2006 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -18.2% |
| 2007 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -22.3% |
| 2008 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -34.0% |
| 2009 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +31.4% |
| 2010 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -5.9% |
| 2011 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -23.5% |
| 2012 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -3.2% |
| 2013 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +3.0% |
| 2014 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +0.8% |
| 2015 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +65.6% |
| 2016 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +17.6% |
| 2017 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -7.4% |
| 2018 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -6.6% |
| 2019 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +15.7% |
Equatorial Guinea compared with similar countries
- Equatorial Guinea's 0 units per US$ of GDP is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0 units per US$ of GDP, 2% of the median. (58 countries reporting)
- Equatorial Guinea's 0 units per US$ of GDP is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 0 units per US$ of GDP, 0% of the median. (45 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC in Equatorial Guinea changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1980 | +110.9% | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 8 |
| 1970s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 8 |
| 1980s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
Countries ranked near Equatorial Guinea
More reference data data for Equatorial Guinea
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0013 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.007 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0083 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0083 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0042 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0044 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0316 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0402 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0358 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied 1.11 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5) - ipcc in Equatorial Guinea?
- Emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5) - ipcc in Equatorial Guinea was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2019, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5) - ipcc recorded in Equatorial Guinea?
- The highest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 1981.
- What is the lowest emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5) - ipcc recorded in Equatorial Guinea?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2012.
- How does Equatorial Guinea rank for emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5) - ipcc?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 182nd out of 202 countries with data for 2019.
- Is emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5) - ipcc rising or falling in Equatorial Guinea?
- Over the last ten years it is up 41.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Equatorial Guinea data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 56 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.