Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Enteric in Belarus
Belarus: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Enteric was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2019. ◆ Volatile
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Enteric in Belarus, 1992–2019
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5) - enteric in Belarus is 0 units per US$ of GDP, measured in 2019.
The figure is down 7.6% on the previous year and down 18.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5) - enteric in Belarus peaked at 0 units per US$ of GDP in 1999 and was at its lowest, 0 units per US$ of GDP, in 2014.
Belarus ranks 55th of 187 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Enteric in Belarus, year by year
| Year | units per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1993 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -0.7% |
| 1994 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +3.6% |
| 1995 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -9.3% |
| 1997 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -0.8% |
| 1998 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -8.5% |
| 1999 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +22.2% |
| 2000 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -10.9% |
| 2001 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +0.6% |
| 2002 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -18.2% |
| 2003 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -19.7% |
| 2004 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -24.8% |
| 2005 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -23.3% |
| 2006 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -18.5% |
| 2007 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -18.9% |
| 2008 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -25.7% |
| 2009 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +22.1% |
| 2010 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -10.9% |
| 2011 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -6.9% |
| 2012 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -4.2% |
| 2013 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -11.1% |
| 2014 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -4.2% |
| 2015 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +39.2% |
| 2016 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +16.8% |
| 2017 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -11.8% |
| 2018 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -9.4% |
| 2019 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -7.6% |
Belarus compared with similar countries
- Belarus's 0 units per US$ of GDP is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0 units per US$ of GDP, 2.8× the median. (56 countries reporting)
- Belarus's 0 units per US$ of GDP is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0 units per US$ of GDP, 7.5× the median. (49 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 8 |
| 2000s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
More reference data data for Belarus
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3462 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3596 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 5.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 2.85 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.84 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 24.26 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.96 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5) - enteric in Belarus?
- Emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5) - enteric in Belarus was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2019, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5) - enteric recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 1999.
- What is the lowest emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5) - enteric recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2014.
- How does Belarus rank for emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5) - enteric?
- Belarus ranks 55th out of 187 countries with data for 2019.
- Is emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5) - enteric rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is down 18.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 28 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Enteric FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.