Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Agricultural Soils, per in South Africa
South Africa: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Agricultural Soils, per was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2019. ◆ Volatile
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Agricultural Soils, per in South Africa, 1961–2019
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - agricultural soils, per in South Africa is 0 units per US$ of GDP, measured in 2019.
That represents a change of down 0.4% on the previous year and down 22.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - agricultural soils, per in South Africa peaked at 0 units per US$ of GDP in 1961 and was at its lowest, 0 units per US$ of GDP, in 2011.
That places South Africa 100th out of 192 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Agricultural Soils, per in South Africa, year by year
| Year | units per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1962 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -4.7% |
| 1963 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -8.6% |
| 1964 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -10.5% |
| 1965 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -8.3% |
| 1966 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -13.5% |
| 1967 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -6.4% |
| 1968 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -7.7% |
| 1969 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -9.6% |
| 1970 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -9.4% |
| 1971 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -8.3% |
| 1972 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -2.6% |
| 1973 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -27.6% |
| 1974 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -16.3% |
| 1975 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +0.4% |
| 1976 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +6.0% |
| 1977 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -5.8% |
| 1978 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -10.0% |
| 1979 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -14.8% |
| 1980 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -28.3% |
| 1981 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -1.7% |
| 1982 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +5.6% |
| 1983 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -16.6% |
| 1984 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +14.0% |
| 1985 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +25.7% |
| 1986 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -12.2% |
| 1987 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -24.8% |
| 1988 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -3.7% |
| 1989 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -1.1% |
| 1990 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -11.3% |
| 1991 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -6.8% |
| 1992 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -10.9% |
| 1993 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +2.3% |
| 1994 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -6.4% |
| 1995 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -12.3% |
| 1996 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +10.8% |
| 1997 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -2.0% |
| 1998 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +10.3% |
| 1999 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +1.1% |
| 2000 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +1.6% |
| 2001 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +9.5% |
| 2002 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +8.7% |
| 2003 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -37.0% |
| 2004 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -22.9% |
| 2005 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -13.9% |
| 2006 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -3.6% |
| 2007 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -6.8% |
| 2008 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +8.0% |
| 2009 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -3.2% |
| 2010 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -23.1% |
| 2011 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -8.5% |
| 2012 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +7.3% |
| 2013 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +6.5% |
| 2014 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +7.4% |
| 2015 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +2.8% |
| 2016 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +3.0% |
| 2017 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -7.7% |
| 2018 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -7.6% |
| 2019 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -0.4% |
South Africa compared with similar countries
- South Africa's 0 units per US$ of GDP is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0 units per US$ of GDP, 95% of the median. (57 countries reporting)
- South Africa's 0 units per US$ of GDP is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 0 units per US$ of GDP, 22% of the median. (45 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 9 |
| 1970s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
Countries ranked near South Africa
- 97 Peru 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 98 El Salvador 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 99 Fiji 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 101 Tonga 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 102 Dominican Republic 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 103 North Macedonia 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
More reference data data for South Africa
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.5111 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 8.71 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 13.63 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.7468 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 13.63 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.71 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.49 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 41.1 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 63.65 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 4.07 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - agricultural soils, per in South Africa?
- Emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - agricultural soils, per in South Africa was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2019, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - agricultural soils, per recorded in South Africa?
- The highest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 1961.
- What is the lowest emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - agricultural soils, per recorded in South Africa?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2011.
- How does South Africa rank for emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - agricultural soils, per?
- South Africa ranks 100th out of 192 countries with data for 2019.
- Is emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - agricultural soils, per rising or falling in South Africa?
- Over the last ten years it is down 22.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this South Africa data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Agricultural Soils, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 59 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Agricultural Soils divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Agricultural Soils ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Agricultural Soils FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Agricultural Soils divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.