Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Agricultural Soils, per in Mexico
Mexico: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Agricultural Soils, per was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2019. ◆ Volatile
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Agricultural Soils, per in Mexico, 1961–2019
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - agricultural soils, per in Mexico is 0 units per US$ of GDP, measured in 2019.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 1.3% on the previous year and down 16.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - agricultural soils, per in Mexico peaked at 0 units per US$ of GDP in 1961 and was at its lowest, 0 units per US$ of GDP, in 2014.
Mexico ranks 108th of 192 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Agricultural Soils, per in Mexico, year by year
| Year | units per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1962 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -3.4% |
| 1963 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -4.1% |
| 1964 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -11.1% |
| 1965 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -3.2% |
| 1966 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -5.5% |
| 1967 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -5.4% |
| 1968 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -5.9% |
| 1969 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -6.9% |
| 1970 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -4.7% |
| 1971 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -10.0% |
| 1972 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -11.4% |
| 1973 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -15.8% |
| 1974 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -20.6% |
| 1975 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -11.6% |
| 1976 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +4.3% |
| 1977 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +9.4% |
| 1978 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -20.3% |
| 1979 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -22.3% |
| 1980 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -30.7% |
| 1981 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -15.6% |
| 1982 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +46.1% |
| 1983 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +17.6% |
| 1984 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -12.5% |
| 1985 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -2.0% |
| 1986 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +47.3% |
| 1987 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -8.8% |
| 1988 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -21.7% |
| 1989 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -15.0% |
| 1990 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -15.3% |
| 1991 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -20.2% |
| 1992 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -13.1% |
| 1993 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -30.7% |
| 1994 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -4.3% |
| 1995 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +40.7% |
| 1996 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -10.3% |
| 1997 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -17.2% |
| 1998 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -3.0% |
| 1999 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -13.4% |
| 2000 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -13.7% |
| 2001 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -5.3% |
| 2002 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -10.2% |
| 2003 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +7.1% |
| 2004 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -5.9% |
| 2005 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -6.1% |
| 2006 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -11.8% |
| 2007 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -5.1% |
| 2008 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -7.9% |
| 2009 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +25.7% |
| 2010 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -12.9% |
| 2011 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -10.2% |
| 2012 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +4.1% |
| 2013 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +0.5% |
| 2014 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -14.7% |
| 2015 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +12.3% |
| 2016 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +23.1% |
| 2017 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -6.5% |
| 2018 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -6.7% |
| 2019 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -1.3% |
Mexico compared with similar countries
- Mexico's 0 units per US$ of GDP is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0 units per US$ of GDP, 80% of the median. (57 countries reporting)
- Mexico's 0 units per US$ of GDP is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0 units per US$ of GDP, 83% of the median. (34 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Agricultural Soils, per in Mexico changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1986 | +47.3% | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 9 |
| 1970s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
Countries ranked near Mexico
More reference data data for Mexico
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.11 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 16.66 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 32.65 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.75 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 32.65 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 13.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 7.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 84.69 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 157.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 9.55 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - agricultural soils, per in Mexico?
- Emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - agricultural soils, per in Mexico was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2019, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - agricultural soils, per recorded in Mexico?
- The highest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 1961.
- What is the lowest emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - agricultural soils, per recorded in Mexico?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2014.
- How does Mexico rank for emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - agricultural soils, per?
- Mexico ranks 108th out of 192 countries with data for 2019.
- Is emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - agricultural soils, per rising or falling in Mexico?
- Over the last ten years it is down 16.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Mexico data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Agricultural Soils, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 59 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Agricultural Soils divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Agricultural Soils ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Agricultural Soils FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Agricultural Soils divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.