Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - AFOLU, per square in Belarus
Belarus: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - AFOLU, per square was -0.0067 units per square kilometre in 2019. ◆ Volatile
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - AFOLU, per square in Belarus, 1992–2019
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - afolu, per square in Belarus is -0.0067 units per square kilometre, measured in 2019.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 20.1% on the previous year and up 67.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - afolu, per square in Belarus peaked at 0.0248 units per square kilometre in 2012 and was at its lowest, -0.0595 units per square kilometre, in 2000.
That places Belarus 190th out of 209 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - AFOLU, per square in Belarus, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | -0.033 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1993 | -0.0377 units per square kilometre | +14.5% |
| 1994 | -0.0439 units per square kilometre | +16.4% |
| 1995 | -0.0482 units per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 1996 | -0.0518 units per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 1997 | -0.0535 units per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1998 | -0.0544 units per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1999 | -0.0551 units per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 2000 | -0.0595 units per square kilometre | +8.0% |
| 2001 | -0.0218 units per square kilometre | -63.4% |
| 2002 | -0.0244 units per square kilometre | +12.0% |
| 2003 | -0.0249 units per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 2004 | -0.026 units per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 2005 | -0.0245 units per square kilometre | -5.7% |
| 2006 | -0.0225 units per square kilometre | -8.2% |
| 2007 | -0.0237 units per square kilometre | +5.7% |
| 2008 | -0.0223 units per square kilometre | -6.1% |
| 2009 | -0.0206 units per square kilometre | -7.8% |
| 2010 | -0.0211 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 2011 | 0.0242 units per square kilometre | -214.8% |
| 2012 | 0.0248 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 2013 | 0.0244 units per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 2014 | 0.0227 units per square kilometre | -7.0% |
| 2015 | 0.0221 units per square kilometre | -2.5% |
| 2016 | -0.0063 units per square kilometre | -128.4% |
| 2017 | -0.0045 units per square kilometre | -28.6% |
| 2018 | -0.0056 units per square kilometre | +24.2% |
| 2019 | -0.0067 units per square kilometre | +20.1% |
Belarus compared with similar countries
- Belarus's -0.0067 units per square kilometre is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.0586 units per square kilometre. (58 countries reporting)
- Belarus's -0.0067 units per square kilometre is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.031 units per square kilometre. (56 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - AFOLU, per square in Belarus changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | +214.8% | -0.0211 units per square kilometre | 0.0242 units per square kilometre |
| 2016 | -128.4% | 0.0221 units per square kilometre | -0.0063 units per square kilometre |
| 2001 | +63.4% | -0.0595 units per square kilometre | -0.0218 units per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.0472 units per square kilometre | -0.0551 units per square kilometre | -0.033 units per square kilometre | 8 |
| 2000s | -0.027 units per square kilometre | -0.0595 units per square kilometre | -0.0206 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0074 units per square kilometre | -0.0211 units per square kilometre | 0.0248 units per square kilometre | 10 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
- 187 Aruba -0.0007 units per square kilometre compare
- 188 Latvia -0.0018 units per square kilometre compare
- 189 Poland -0.0027 units per square kilometre compare
- 191 Cayman Islands -0.0154 units per square kilometre compare
- 192 Bhutan -0.0205 units per square kilometre compare
- 193 Sweden -0.0223 units per square kilometre compare
More reference data data for Belarus
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3462 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3596 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 5.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 2.85 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.84 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 24.26 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.96 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - afolu, per square in Belarus?
- Emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - afolu, per square in Belarus was -0.0067 units per square kilometre in 2019, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - afolu, per square recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0248 units per square kilometre in 2012.
- What is the lowest emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - afolu, per square recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.0595 units per square kilometre in 2000.
- How does Belarus rank for emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - afolu, per square?
- Belarus ranks 190th out of 209 countries with data for 2019.
- Is emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - afolu, per square rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is up 67.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - AFOLU, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 28 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - AFOLU divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - AFOLU ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - AFOLU FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - AFOLU divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.