Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation, per square in Panama
Panama: Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation, per square was 0 units per square kilometre in 2019. ▼ Falling
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation, per square in Panama, 1961–2019
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2019, emission totals - emissions (ch4) - rice cultivation, per square in Panama stood at 0 units per square kilometre.
The figure is down 10.7% on the previous year and down 10.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, emission totals - emissions (ch4) - rice cultivation, per square in Panama peaked at 0 units per square kilometre in 1965 and was at its lowest, 0 units per square kilometre, in 1997.
That places Panama 76th out of 117 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 59 years of available data.
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation, per square in Panama, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0 units per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 1963 | 0 units per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 1964 | 0 units per square kilometre | +16.9% |
| 1965 | 0 units per square kilometre | +10.2% |
| 1966 | 0 units per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 1967 | 0 units per square kilometre | -1.5% |
| 1968 | 0 units per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 1969 | 0 units per square kilometre | -2.3% |
| 1970 | 0 units per square kilometre | -25.9% |
| 1971 | 0 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1972 | 0 units per square kilometre | +10.0% |
| 1973 | 0 units per square kilometre | +0.1% |
| 1974 | 0 units per square kilometre | +6.6% |
| 1975 | 0 units per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1976 | 0 units per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 1977 | 0 units per square kilometre | -10.1% |
| 1978 | 0 units per square kilometre | -9.9% |
| 1979 | 0 units per square kilometre | -4.9% |
| 1980 | 0 units per square kilometre | -1.9% |
| 1981 | 0 units per square kilometre | +8.0% |
| 1982 | 0 units per square kilometre | -4.8% |
| 1983 | 0 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1984 | 0 units per square kilometre | -4.9% |
| 1985 | 0 units per square kilometre | -3.1% |
| 1986 | 0 units per square kilometre | -4.4% |
| 1987 | 0 units per square kilometre | -3.7% |
| 1988 | 0 units per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 1989 | 0 units per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 1990 | 0 units per square kilometre | +11.9% |
| 1991 | 0 units per square kilometre | -4.3% |
| 1992 | 0 units per square kilometre | -1.0% |
| 1993 | 0 units per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 1994 | 0 units per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 1995 | 0 units per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 1996 | 0 units per square kilometre | -5.6% |
| 1997 | 0 units per square kilometre | -25.5% |
| 1998 | 0 units per square kilometre | +26.7% |
| 1999 | 0 units per square kilometre | -11.6% |
| 2000 | 0 units per square kilometre | +22.3% |
| 2001 | 0 units per square kilometre | +11.9% |
| 2002 | 0 units per square kilometre | +8.1% |
| 2003 | 0 units per square kilometre | +6.8% |
| 2004 | 0 units per square kilometre | -6.4% |
| 2005 | 0 units per square kilometre | -17.0% |
| 2006 | 0 units per square kilometre | +14.5% |
| 2007 | 0 units per square kilometre | -9.1% |
| 2008 | 0 units per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 2009 | 0 units per square kilometre | -0.3% |
| 2010 | 0 units per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 2011 | 0 units per square kilometre | -6.3% |
| 2012 | 0 units per square kilometre | -12.5% |
| 2013 | 0 units per square kilometre | +7.8% |
| 2014 | 0 units per square kilometre | -15.7% |
| 2015 | 0 units per square kilometre | +18.1% |
| 2016 | 0 units per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 2017 | 0 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 2018 | 0 units per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 2019 | 0 units per square kilometre | -10.7% |
Panama compared with similar countries
- Panama's 0 units per square kilometre is below the median for high income countries, which is 0 units per square kilometre, 66% of the median. (23 countries reporting)
- Panama's 0 units per square kilometre is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0 units per square kilometre, 94% of the median. (26 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 10 |
Countries ranked near Panama
More reference data data for Panama
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1446 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.6179 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.9793 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0285 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.9793 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4849 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.2267 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 3.44 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.08 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1553 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is emission totals - emissions (ch4) - rice cultivation, per square in Panama?
- Emission totals - emissions (ch4) - rice cultivation, per square in Panama was 0 units per square kilometre in 2019, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest emission totals - emissions (ch4) - rice cultivation, per square recorded in Panama?
- The highest recorded value was 0 units per square kilometre in 1965.
- What is the lowest emission totals - emissions (ch4) - rice cultivation, per square recorded in Panama?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 units per square kilometre in 1997.
- How does Panama rank for emission totals - emissions (ch4) - rice cultivation, per square?
- Panama ranks 76th out of 117 countries with data for 2019.
- Is emission totals - emissions (ch4) - rice cultivation, per square rising or falling in Panama?
- Over the last ten years it is down 10.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Panama data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 59 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.