Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation, per square in Guatemala
Guatemala: Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation, per square was 0 units per square kilometre in 2019. ▼ Falling
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation, per square in Guatemala, 1961–2019
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for emission totals - emissions (ch4) - rice cultivation, per square in Guatemala is 0 units per square kilometre, measured in 2019.
That represents a change of up 29.0% on the previous year and up 42.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, emission totals - emissions (ch4) - rice cultivation, per square in Guatemala peaked at 0 units per square kilometre in 1987 and was at its lowest, 0 units per square kilometre, in 1966.
Guatemala ranks 94th of 117 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 59 years of available data.
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation, per square in Guatemala, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0 units per square kilometre | +14.6% |
| 1963 | 0 units per square kilometre | +22.0% |
| 1964 | 0 units per square kilometre | -9.1% |
| 1965 | 0 units per square kilometre | -34.3% |
| 1966 | 0 units per square kilometre | -18.2% |
| 1967 | 0 units per square kilometre | +90.7% |
| 1968 | 0 units per square kilometre | +15.9% |
| 1969 | 0 units per square kilometre | -31.1% |
| 1970 | 0 units per square kilometre | +20.7% |
| 1971 | 0 units per square kilometre | +21.9% |
| 1972 | 0 units per square kilometre | -20.0% |
| 1973 | 0 units per square kilometre | +12.8% |
| 1974 | 0 units per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 1975 | 0 units per square kilometre | +33.5% |
| 1976 | 0 units per square kilometre | +14.4% |
| 1977 | 0 units per square kilometre | -35.5% |
| 1978 | 0 units per square kilometre | -5.1% |
| 1979 | 0 units per square kilometre | +9.0% |
| 1980 | 0 units per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 1981 | 0 units per square kilometre | +22.2% |
| 1982 | 0 units per square kilometre | +12.7% |
| 1983 | 0 units per square kilometre | -29.0% |
| 1984 | 0 units per square kilometre | +30.0% |
| 1985 | 0 units per square kilometre | -9.2% |
| 1986 | 0 units per square kilometre | -1.4% |
| 1987 | 0 units per square kilometre | +62.4% |
| 1988 | 0 units per square kilometre | -48.5% |
| 1989 | 0 units per square kilometre | +26.0% |
| 1990 | 0 units per square kilometre | -5.6% |
| 1991 | 0 units per square kilometre | +15.7% |
| 1992 | 0 units per square kilometre | -5.9% |
| 1993 | 0 units per square kilometre | +12.2% |
| 1994 | 0 units per square kilometre | -25.8% |
| 1995 | 0 units per square kilometre | -15.1% |
| 1996 | 0 units per square kilometre | +7.6% |
| 1997 | 0 units per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 1998 | 0 units per square kilometre | +14.9% |
| 1999 | 0 units per square kilometre | +8.1% |
| 2000 | 0 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 0 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2002 | 0 units per square kilometre | +6.5% |
| 2003 | 0 units per square kilometre | -9.5% |
| 2004 | 0 units per square kilometre | -42.2% |
| 2005 | 0 units per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 2006 | 0 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 0 units per square kilometre | -15.4% |
| 2008 | 0 units per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 2009 | 0 units per square kilometre | +26.8% |
| 2010 | 0 units per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 2011 | 0 units per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 2012 | 0 units per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 2013 | 0 units per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 2014 | 0 units per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 2015 | 0 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 0 units per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 2017 | 0 units per square kilometre | -5.5% |
| 2018 | 0 units per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 2019 | 0 units per square kilometre | +29.0% |
Guatemala compared with similar countries
- Guatemala's 0 units per square kilometre is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0 units per square kilometre, 9% of the median. (36 countries reporting)
- Guatemala's 0 units per square kilometre is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0 units per square kilometre, 20% of the median. (26 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 10 |
Countries ranked near Guatemala
More reference data data for Guatemala
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9286 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.39 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.72 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1246 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.72 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.11 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.9 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 7.68 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 18.61 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.6786 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is emission totals - emissions (ch4) - rice cultivation, per square in Guatemala?
- Emission totals - emissions (ch4) - rice cultivation, per square in Guatemala was 0 units per square kilometre in 2019, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest emission totals - emissions (ch4) - rice cultivation, per square recorded in Guatemala?
- The highest recorded value was 0 units per square kilometre in 1987.
- What is the lowest emission totals - emissions (ch4) - rice cultivation, per square recorded in Guatemala?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 units per square kilometre in 1966.
- How does Guatemala rank for emission totals - emissions (ch4) - rice cultivation, per square?
- Guatemala ranks 94th out of 117 countries with data for 2019.
- Is emission totals - emissions (ch4) - rice cultivation, per square rising or falling in Guatemala?
- Over the last ten years it is up 42.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Guatemala data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 59 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.