Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation, per square in Ecuador
Ecuador: Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation, per square was 0.0002 units per square kilometre in 2019. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2019)
0.0002 units per square kilometre
Change on year
down 13.8%
World rank
33rd
of 117 countries
All-time high
0.0004 units per square kilometre
in 2004
All-time low
0 units per square kilometre
in 1971
Years of data
59
1961–2019
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation, per square in Ecuador, 1961–2019
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
Ecuador recorded 0.0002 units per square kilometre for emission totals - emissions (ch4) - rice cultivation, per square in 2019.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 13.8% on the previous year and down 34.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, emission totals - emissions (ch4) - rice cultivation, per square in Ecuador peaked at 0.0004 units per square kilometre in 2004 and was at its lowest, 0 units per square kilometre, in 1971.
Ecuador ranks 33rd of 117 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation, per square in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | +18.1% |
| 1963 | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 1964 | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | -3.7% |
| 1965 | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | -5.6% |
| 1966 | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | +7.6% |
| 1967 | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1968 | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | -1.5% |
| 1969 | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | -18.0% |
| 1970 | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | -5.5% |
| 1971 | 0 units per square kilometre | -34.7% |
| 1972 | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | +61.5% |
| 1973 | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | -7.3% |
| 1974 | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | +21.2% |
| 1975 | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | +19.2% |
| 1976 | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | +10.1% |
| 1977 | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | -20.6% |
| 1978 | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | -24.1% |
| 1979 | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | +36.4% |
| 1980 | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | +14.2% |
| 1981 | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 1982 | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 1983 | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | -28.0% |
| 1984 | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | +46.6% |
| 1985 | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | +7.8% |
| 1986 | 0.0002 units per square kilometre | +52.0% |
| 1987 | 0.0002 units per square kilometre | +21.1% |
| 1988 | 0.0002 units per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 1989 | 0.0002 units per square kilometre | -3.5% |
| 1990 | 0.0002 units per square kilometre | -3.0% |
| 1991 | 0.0002 units per square kilometre | -23.1% |
| 1992 | 0.0002 units per square kilometre | +49.5% |
| 1993 | 0.0003 units per square kilometre | +15.1% |
| 1994 | 0.0003 units per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 1995 | 0.0003 units per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 1996 | 0.0003 units per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 1997 | 0.0003 units per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 1998 | 0.0003 units per square kilometre | -11.6% |
| 1999 | 0.0003 units per square kilometre | +12.5% |
| 2000 | 0.0003 units per square kilometre | -7.5% |
| 2001 | 0.0003 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 2002 | 0.0003 units per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 2003 | 0.0003 units per square kilometre | -3.3% |
| 2004 | 0.0004 units per square kilometre | +17.9% |
| 2005 | 0.0003 units per square kilometre | -10.5% |
| 2006 | 0.0003 units per square kilometre | -5.2% |
| 2007 | 0.0003 units per square kilometre | +11.4% |
| 2008 | 0.0003 units per square kilometre | -10.9% |
| 2009 | 0.0003 units per square kilometre | +11.3% |
| 2010 | 0.0003 units per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 2011 | 0.0003 units per square kilometre | -16.1% |
| 2012 | 0.0003 units per square kilometre | +12.5% |
| 2013 | 0.0003 units per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 2014 | 0.0003 units per square kilometre | -10.7% |
| 2015 | 0.0003 units per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 2016 | 0.0003 units per square kilometre | -2.4% |
| 2017 | 0.0003 units per square kilometre | -2.2% |
| 2018 | 0.0003 units per square kilometre | -16.7% |
| 2019 | 0.0002 units per square kilometre | -13.8% |
Ecuador compared with similar countries
- Ecuador's 0.0002 units per square kilometre is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0 units per square kilometre, 5.1× the median. (36 countries reporting)
- Ecuador's 0.0002 units per square kilometre is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0 units per square kilometre, 12.0× the median. (26 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | 0.0002 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0003 units per square kilometre | 0.0002 units per square kilometre | 0.0003 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0003 units per square kilometre | 0.0003 units per square kilometre | 0.0004 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0003 units per square kilometre | 0.0002 units per square kilometre | 0.0003 units per square kilometre | 10 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
- 30 Madagascar 0.0002 units per square kilometre compare
- 31 Uruguay 0.0002 units per square kilometre compare
- 32 Egypt 0.0002 units per square kilometre compare
- 34 Tanzania 0.0002 units per square kilometre compare
- 35 Burkina Faso 0.0002 units per square kilometre compare
- 36 Burundi 0.0002 units per square kilometre compare
More reference data data for Ecuador
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9379 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.51 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 4.74 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1826 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 4.74 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 13.63 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 23.57 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.9943 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is emission totals - emissions (ch4) - rice cultivation, per square in Ecuador?
- Emission totals - emissions (ch4) - rice cultivation, per square in Ecuador was 0.0002 units per square kilometre in 2019, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest emission totals - emissions (ch4) - rice cultivation, per square recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0004 units per square kilometre in 2004.
- What is the lowest emission totals - emissions (ch4) - rice cultivation, per square recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 units per square kilometre in 1971.
- How does Ecuador rank for emission totals - emissions (ch4) - rice cultivation, per square?
- Ecuador ranks 33rd out of 117 countries with data for 2019.
- Is emission totals - emissions (ch4) - rice cultivation, per square rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is down 34.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 59 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.