Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation, per square in Democratic Republic of Congo
Democratic Republic of Congo: Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation, per square was 0 units per square kilometre in 2019. ◆ Volatile
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation, per square in Democratic Republic of Congo, 1961–2019
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2019, emission totals - emissions (ch4) - rice cultivation, per square in Democratic Republic of Congo stood at 0 units per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 59 years on record.
The figure is up 7.1% on the previous year and up 332.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, emission totals - emissions (ch4) - rice cultivation, per square in Democratic Republic of Congo peaked at 0 units per square kilometre in 2019 and was at its lowest, 0 units per square kilometre, in 1964.
That places Democratic Republic of Congo 71st out of 117 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation, per square in Democratic Republic of Congo, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0 units per square kilometre | +5.7% |
| 1963 | 0 units per square kilometre | -19.4% |
| 1964 | 0 units per square kilometre | -9.3% |
| 1965 | 0 units per square kilometre | +50.1% |
| 1966 | 0 units per square kilometre | +10.9% |
| 1967 | 0 units per square kilometre | +10.4% |
| 1968 | 0 units per square kilometre | +85.6% |
| 1969 | 0 units per square kilometre | -8.4% |
| 1970 | 0 units per square kilometre | +15.0% |
| 1971 | 0 units per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1972 | 0 units per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 1973 | 0 units per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1974 | 0 units per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 1975 | 0 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1976 | 0 units per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1977 | 0 units per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1978 | 0 units per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 1979 | 0 units per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1980 | 0 units per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1981 | 0 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1982 | 0 units per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1983 | 0 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1984 | 0 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1985 | 0 units per square kilometre | +19.0% |
| 1986 | 0 units per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 1987 | 0 units per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 1988 | 0 units per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 1989 | 0 units per square kilometre | +5.5% |
| 1990 | 0 units per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 1991 | 0 units per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 1992 | 0 units per square kilometre | +13.5% |
| 1993 | 0 units per square kilometre | +7.0% |
| 1994 | 0 units per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 1995 | 0 units per square kilometre | -15.4% |
| 1996 | 0 units per square kilometre | -7.3% |
| 1997 | 0 units per square kilometre | -7.4% |
| 1998 | 0 units per square kilometre | +12.6% |
| 1999 | 0 units per square kilometre | -3.5% |
| 2000 | 0 units per square kilometre | -3.5% |
| 2001 | 0 units per square kilometre | -3.5% |
| 2002 | 0 units per square kilometre | -3.6% |
| 2003 | 0 units per square kilometre | +0.1% |
| 2004 | 0 units per square kilometre | +0.1% |
| 2005 | 0 units per square kilometre | +0.1% |
| 2006 | 0 units per square kilometre | +0.1% |
| 2007 | 0 units per square kilometre | +0.1% |
| 2008 | 0 units per square kilometre | +0.1% |
| 2009 | 0 units per square kilometre | +0.1% |
| 2010 | 0 units per square kilometre | +0.1% |
| 2011 | 0 units per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 2012 | 0 units per square kilometre | +102.3% |
| 2013 | 0 units per square kilometre | +25.5% |
| 2014 | 0 units per square kilometre | +25.8% |
| 2015 | 0 units per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 2016 | 0 units per square kilometre | +8.6% |
| 2017 | 0 units per square kilometre | +9.2% |
| 2018 | 0 units per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 2019 | 0 units per square kilometre | +7.1% |
Democratic Republic of Congo compared with similar countries
- Democratic Republic of Congo's 0 units per square kilometre is below the median for low income countries, which is 0 units per square kilometre, 46% of the median. (22 countries reporting)
- Democratic Republic of Congo's 0 units per square kilometre is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 0 units per square kilometre, 65% of the median. (37 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation, per square in Democratic Republic of Congo changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | +102.3% | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre |
| 1968 | +85.6% | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre |
| 1965 | +50.1% | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 10 |
Countries ranked near Democratic Republic of Congo
- 68 Brunei 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 69 Mauritania 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 70 Tajikistan 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 72 Argentina 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 73 Togo 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 74 Costa Rica 0 units per square kilometre compare
More reference data data for Democratic Republic of Congo
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.3528 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.56 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.31 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.335 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.31 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.44 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 6.66 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 11.56 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.82 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is emission totals - emissions (ch4) - rice cultivation, per square in Democratic Republic of Congo?
- Emission totals - emissions (ch4) - rice cultivation, per square in Democratic Republic of Congo was 0 units per square kilometre in 2019, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest emission totals - emissions (ch4) - rice cultivation, per square recorded in Democratic Republic of Congo?
- The highest recorded value was 0 units per square kilometre in 2019.
- What is the lowest emission totals - emissions (ch4) - rice cultivation, per square recorded in Democratic Republic of Congo?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 units per square kilometre in 1964.
- How does Democratic Republic of Congo rank for emission totals - emissions (ch4) - rice cultivation, per square?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 71st out of 117 countries with data for 2019.
- Is emission totals - emissions (ch4) - rice cultivation, per square rising or falling in Democratic Republic of Congo?
- Over the last ten years it is up 332.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Democratic Republic of Congo data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 59 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Rice Cultivation divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.