Elite Consultations Score in Tunisia
Tunisia: Elite Consultations Score was 0.495 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2025)
0.495
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
95th
of 176 countries
All-time high
2.48
in 2012
All-time low
-1.54
in 1881
Years of data
237
1789–2025
Elite Consultations Score in Tunisia, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2025, elite consultations score in Tunisia stood at 0.495.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 79.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, elite consultations score in Tunisia peaked at 2.48 in 2012 and was at its lowest, -1.54, in 1881.
Tunisia ranks 95th of 176 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Elite Consultations Score in Tunisia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | -0.804 | — |
| 1790 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1791 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1792 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1793 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1794 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1795 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1796 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1797 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1798 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1799 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1800 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1801 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1802 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1803 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1804 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1805 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1806 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1807 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1808 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1809 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1810 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1811 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1812 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1813 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1814 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1815 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1816 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1817 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1818 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1819 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1820 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1821 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1822 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1823 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1824 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1825 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1826 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1827 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1828 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1829 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1830 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1831 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1832 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1833 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1834 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1835 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1836 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1837 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1838 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1839 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1840 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1841 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1842 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1843 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1844 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1845 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1846 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1847 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1848 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1849 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1850 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1851 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1852 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1853 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1854 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1855 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1856 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 1857 | -0.185 | -77.0% |
| 1858 | -0.185 | -0.0% |
| 1859 | -0.185 | -0.0% |
| 1860 | -0.185 | -0.0% |
| 1861 | -0.185 | -0.0% |
| 1862 | -0.185 | -0.0% |
| 1863 | -0.185 | -0.0% |
| 1864 | -0.828 | +347.6% |
| 1865 | -0.828 | -0.0% |
| 1866 | -0.828 | -0.0% |
| 1867 | -0.828 | -0.0% |
| 1868 | -0.828 | -0.0% |
| 1869 | -0.828 | -0.0% |
| 1870 | -0.828 | -0.0% |
| 1871 | -0.828 | -0.0% |
| 1872 | -0.828 | -0.0% |
| 1873 | -0.828 | -0.0% |
| 1874 | -0.134 | -83.8% |
| 1875 | -0.134 | -0.0% |
| 1876 | -0.134 | -0.0% |
| 1877 | -0.134 | -0.0% |
| 1878 | -0.84 | +526.9% |
| 1879 | -0.84 | -0.0% |
| 1880 | -0.84 | -0.0% |
| 1881 | -1.54 | +83.3% |
| 1882 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1883 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1884 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1885 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1886 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1887 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1888 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1889 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1890 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1891 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1892 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1893 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1894 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1895 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1896 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1897 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1898 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1899 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1900 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1901 | -0.89 | -42.2% |
| 1902 | -0.89 | -0.0% |
| 1903 | -0.89 | -0.0% |
| 1904 | -0.89 | -0.0% |
| 1905 | -0.745 | -16.3% |
| 1906 | -0.745 | -0.0% |
| 1907 | -0.745 | -0.0% |
| 1908 | -0.745 | -0.0% |
| 1909 | -0.745 | -0.0% |
| 1910 | -0.745 | -0.0% |
| 1911 | -0.745 | -0.0% |
| 1912 | -0.745 | -0.0% |
| 1913 | -0.745 | -0.0% |
| 1914 | -0.745 | -0.0% |
| 1915 | -0.745 | -0.0% |
| 1916 | -0.745 | -0.0% |
| 1917 | -0.745 | -0.0% |
| 1918 | -0.745 | -0.0% |
| 1919 | -0.745 | -0.0% |
| 1920 | -0.745 | -0.0% |
| 1921 | -0.745 | -0.0% |
| 1922 | -0.745 | -0.0% |
| 1923 | -0.745 | -0.0% |
| 1924 | -0.745 | -0.0% |
| 1925 | -0.745 | -0.0% |
| 1926 | -0.745 | -0.0% |
| 1927 | -0.745 | -0.0% |
| 1928 | -0.745 | -0.0% |
| 1929 | -0.745 | -0.0% |
| 1930 | -0.745 | -0.0% |
| 1931 | -0.745 | -0.0% |
| 1932 | -0.745 | -0.0% |
| 1933 | -0.745 | -0.0% |
| 1934 | -0.745 | -0.0% |
| 1935 | 0.277 | -137.2% |
| 1936 | 0.277 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 0.277 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 0.277 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 0.277 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 0.277 | +0.0% |
| 1941 | 0.277 | +0.0% |
| 1942 | 0.277 | +0.0% |
| 1943 | 0.277 | +0.0% |
| 1944 | 0.277 | +0.0% |
| 1945 | 0.277 | +0.0% |
| 1946 | 0.277 | +0.0% |
| 1947 | 0.277 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 0.277 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 0.277 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 0.277 | +0.0% |
| 1951 | 0.277 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 0.277 | +0.0% |
| 1953 | 0.277 | +0.0% |
| 1954 | 0.277 | +0.0% |
| 1955 | 0.277 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 0.64 | +131.0% |
| 1957 | 0.64 | +0.0% |
| 1958 | 0.439 | -31.4% |
| 1959 | 0.439 | +0.0% |
| 1960 | 0.439 | +0.0% |
| 1961 | 0.439 | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 0.439 | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 0.439 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0.439 | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.439 | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 0.439 | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.439 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 0.439 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 0.653 | +48.7% |
| 1970 | 0.455 | -30.3% |
| 1971 | 0.455 | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.455 | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 0.455 | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 0.455 | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 0.455 | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 0.455 | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 0.455 | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 0.455 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.455 | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 0.551 | +21.1% |
| 1981 | 0.551 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.551 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.551 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.551 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.551 | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.551 | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 0.939 | +70.4% |
| 1988 | 1.13 | +20.8% |
| 1989 | 0.637 | -43.8% |
| 1990 | 1.22 | +91.7% |
| 1991 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.505 | -58.6% |
| 2005 | 0.505 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.505 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 0.505 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.505 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 0.505 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 0.505 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 2.23 | +342.2% |
| 2012 | 2.48 | +10.9% |
| 2013 | 2.23 | -10.1% |
| 2014 | 2.23 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 2.35 | +5.7% |
| 2016 | 2.35 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 2.18 | -7.3% |
| 2018 | 2.18 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 2.18 | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 2.18 | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 1.34 | -38.4% |
| 2022 | 0.495 | -63.2% |
| 2023 | 0.495 | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 0.495 | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 0.495 | +0.0% |
Tunisia compared with similar countries
- Tunisia's 0.495 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0.213, 2.3× the median. (46 countries reporting)
- Tunisia's 0.495 is above the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 0.222, 2.2× the median. (23 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | -0.804 | -0.804 | -0.804 | 1 |
| 1790s | -0.804 | -0.804 | -0.804 | 10 |
| 1800s | -0.804 | -0.804 | -0.804 | 10 |
| 1810s | -0.804 | -0.804 | -0.804 | 10 |
| 1820s | -0.804 | -0.804 | -0.804 | 10 |
| 1830s | -0.804 | -0.804 | -0.804 | 10 |
| 1840s | -0.804 | -0.804 | -0.804 | 10 |
| 1850s | -0.6183 | -0.804 | -0.185 | 10 |
| 1860s | -0.5708 | -0.828 | -0.185 | 10 |
| 1870s | -0.5528 | -0.84 | -0.134 | 10 |
| 1880s | -1.47 | -1.54 | -0.84 | 10 |
| 1890s | -1.54 | -1.54 | -1.54 | 10 |
| 1900s | -0.8825 | -1.54 | -0.745 | 10 |
| 1910s | -0.745 | -0.745 | -0.745 | 10 |
| 1920s | -0.745 | -0.745 | -0.745 | 10 |
| 1930s | -0.234 | -0.745 | 0.277 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.277 | 0.277 | 0.277 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.382 | 0.277 | 0.64 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.4604 | 0.439 | 0.653 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.455 | 0.455 | 0.455 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.6567 | 0.551 | 1.13 | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.22 | 1.22 | 1.22 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.7914 | 0.505 | 1.22 | 10 |
| 2010s | 2.09 | 0.505 | 2.48 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.9178 | 0.495 | 2.18 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Tunisia
- 92 Democratic Republic of Congo 0.585 compare
- 93 Colombia 0.509 compare
- 94 Saudi Arabia 0.499 compare
- 96 India 0.489 compare
- 97 Solomon Islands 0.452 compare
- 98 Gabon 0.447 compare
More reference data data for Tunisia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.148 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.38 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1317 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.38 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4961 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.1849 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 8.07 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 14.52 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.7169 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is elite consultations score in Tunisia?
- Elite consultations score in Tunisia was 0.495 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest elite consultations score recorded in Tunisia?
- The highest recorded value was 2.48 in 2012.
- What is the lowest elite consultations score recorded in Tunisia?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.54 in 1881.
- How does Tunisia rank for elite consultations score?
- Tunisia ranks 95th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is elite consultations score rising or falling in Tunisia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 79.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Tunisia data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Elite Consultations Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites consult other elites across the political spectrum and from relevant sectors of society and business when considering important policy changes.