Elite Consultations Score in Serbia
Serbia: Elite Consultations Score was 0.3 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2025)
0.3
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
106th
of 176 countries
All-time high
1.84
in 2000
All-time low
-2.09
in 1804
Years of data
237
1789–2025
Elite Consultations Score in Serbia, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
Serbia recorded 0.3 for elite consultations score in 2025.
The figure is down 30.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, elite consultations score in Serbia peaked at 1.84 in 2000 and was at its lowest, -2.09, in 1804.
That places Serbia 106th out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Elite Consultations Score in Serbia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | -1.19 | — |
| 1790 | -1.19 | -0.0% |
| 1791 | -1.19 | -0.0% |
| 1792 | -1.19 | -0.0% |
| 1793 | -1.19 | -0.0% |
| 1794 | -1.19 | -0.0% |
| 1795 | -1.19 | -0.0% |
| 1796 | -1.19 | -0.0% |
| 1797 | -1.19 | -0.0% |
| 1798 | -1.19 | -0.0% |
| 1799 | -0.447 | -62.3% |
| 1800 | -0.447 | -0.0% |
| 1801 | -0.447 | -0.0% |
| 1802 | -0.447 | -0.0% |
| 1803 | -0.447 | -0.0% |
| 1804 | -2.09 | +367.6% |
| 1805 | -2.09 | -0.0% |
| 1806 | -2.09 | -0.0% |
| 1807 | -2.09 | -0.0% |
| 1808 | -2.09 | -0.0% |
| 1809 | -2.09 | -0.0% |
| 1810 | -2.09 | -0.0% |
| 1811 | -2.09 | -0.0% |
| 1812 | -2.09 | -0.0% |
| 1813 | -2.09 | -0.0% |
| 1814 | -0.447 | -78.6% |
| 1815 | -1.39 | +211.2% |
| 1816 | -1.39 | -0.0% |
| 1817 | -1.39 | -0.0% |
| 1818 | -1.39 | -0.0% |
| 1819 | -1.39 | -0.0% |
| 1820 | -1.39 | -0.0% |
| 1821 | -1.39 | -0.0% |
| 1822 | -1.39 | -0.0% |
| 1823 | -1.39 | -0.0% |
| 1824 | -1.39 | -0.0% |
| 1825 | -1.39 | -0.0% |
| 1826 | -1.39 | -0.0% |
| 1827 | -1.39 | -0.0% |
| 1828 | -1.39 | -0.0% |
| 1829 | -1.39 | -0.0% |
| 1830 | -1.39 | -0.0% |
| 1831 | -1.39 | -0.0% |
| 1832 | -1.39 | -0.0% |
| 1833 | -1.39 | -0.0% |
| 1834 | -1.39 | -0.0% |
| 1835 | -1.39 | -0.0% |
| 1836 | -1.39 | -0.0% |
| 1837 | -1.39 | -0.0% |
| 1838 | -1.39 | -0.0% |
| 1839 | -1.39 | -0.0% |
| 1840 | -0.068 | -95.1% |
| 1841 | -0.068 | -0.0% |
| 1842 | 0.59 | -967.6% |
| 1843 | 0.59 | +0.0% |
| 1844 | 0.59 | +0.0% |
| 1845 | 0.59 | +0.0% |
| 1846 | 0.59 | +0.0% |
| 1847 | 0.59 | +0.0% |
| 1848 | 0.59 | +0.0% |
| 1849 | 0.59 | +0.0% |
| 1850 | 0.59 | +0.0% |
| 1851 | 0.59 | +0.0% |
| 1852 | 0.59 | +0.0% |
| 1853 | 0.59 | +0.0% |
| 1854 | 0.59 | +0.0% |
| 1855 | 0.59 | +0.0% |
| 1856 | 0.59 | +0.0% |
| 1857 | 0.59 | +0.0% |
| 1858 | -1.22 | -307.5% |
| 1859 | -1.22 | -0.0% |
| 1860 | -1.22 | -0.0% |
| 1861 | -1.22 | -0.0% |
| 1862 | -1.22 | -0.0% |
| 1863 | -1.22 | -0.0% |
| 1864 | -1.22 | -0.0% |
| 1865 | -1.22 | -0.0% |
| 1866 | -1.22 | -0.0% |
| 1867 | -1.22 | -0.0% |
| 1868 | -1.22 | -0.0% |
| 1869 | -1.22 | -0.0% |
| 1870 | -1.22 | -0.0% |
| 1871 | -1.22 | -0.0% |
| 1872 | -1.22 | -0.0% |
| 1873 | -1.22 | -0.0% |
| 1874 | -1.22 | -0.0% |
| 1875 | -1.22 | -0.0% |
| 1876 | -1.22 | -0.0% |
| 1877 | -1.22 | -0.0% |
| 1878 | -1.22 | -0.0% |
| 1879 | -1.22 | -0.0% |
| 1880 | -1.22 | -0.0% |
| 1881 | -1.22 | -0.0% |
| 1882 | -1.22 | -0.0% |
| 1883 | -1.22 | -0.0% |
| 1884 | -1.22 | -0.0% |
| 1885 | -1.22 | -0.0% |
| 1886 | -1.22 | -0.0% |
| 1887 | -1.22 | -0.0% |
| 1888 | -1.22 | -0.0% |
| 1889 | -1.22 | -0.0% |
| 1890 | -1.22 | -0.0% |
| 1891 | -1.22 | -0.0% |
| 1892 | -1.22 | -0.0% |
| 1893 | -1.22 | -0.0% |
| 1894 | -1.22 | -0.0% |
| 1895 | -1.22 | -0.0% |
| 1896 | -1.22 | -0.0% |
| 1897 | -1.22 | -0.0% |
| 1898 | -1.22 | -0.0% |
| 1899 | -1.22 | -0.0% |
| 1900 | -1.22 | -0.0% |
| 1901 | -1.22 | -0.0% |
| 1902 | -1.22 | -0.0% |
| 1903 | -0.847 | -30.8% |
| 1904 | -0.534 | -37.0% |
| 1905 | -0.534 | -0.0% |
| 1906 | -0.534 | -0.0% |
| 1907 | -0.534 | -0.0% |
| 1908 | -0.534 | -0.0% |
| 1909 | -0.534 | -0.0% |
| 1910 | -0.534 | -0.0% |
| 1911 | -0.534 | -0.0% |
| 1912 | -0.534 | -0.0% |
| 1913 | -0.534 | -0.0% |
| 1914 | -0.534 | -0.0% |
| 1915 | -0.799 | +49.6% |
| 1916 | -1.19 | +48.8% |
| 1917 | -1.19 | -0.0% |
| 1918 | -0.806 | -32.2% |
| 1919 | 0.146 | -118.1% |
| 1920 | 0.146 | +0.0% |
| 1921 | 0.146 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 0.146 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 0.146 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 0.146 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 0.146 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 0.146 | +0.0% |
| 1927 | 0.146 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 0.146 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | -0.018 | -112.3% |
| 1930 | -0.018 | -0.0% |
| 1931 | -0.018 | -0.0% |
| 1932 | 0.403 | -2338.9% |
| 1933 | 0.403 | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 0.403 | +0.0% |
| 1935 | 0.403 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 0.403 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 0.403 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 0.403 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 0.403 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 0.403 | +0.0% |
| 1941 | -1.68 | -517.1% |
| 1942 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1943 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1944 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1945 | -0.564 | -66.4% |
| 1946 | -0.564 | -0.0% |
| 1947 | -0.564 | -0.0% |
| 1948 | -0.564 | -0.0% |
| 1949 | -0.564 | -0.0% |
| 1950 | -0.151 | -73.2% |
| 1951 | -0.151 | -0.0% |
| 1952 | -0.151 | -0.0% |
| 1953 | -0.151 | -0.0% |
| 1954 | -0.151 | -0.0% |
| 1955 | -0.151 | -0.0% |
| 1956 | 0.02 | -113.2% |
| 1957 | 0.02 | +0.0% |
| 1958 | 0.02 | +0.0% |
| 1959 | 0.02 | +0.0% |
| 1960 | 0.02 | +0.0% |
| 1961 | 0.02 | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 0.02 | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 0.02 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0.02 | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.02 | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 0.02 | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.02 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 0.02 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 0.02 | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 0.02 | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 0.02 | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.02 | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 0.02 | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 0.02 | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 0.02 | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 0.02 | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 0.02 | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 0.02 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.02 | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 0.02 | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 0.122 | +510.0% |
| 1982 | 0.122 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.122 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.122 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.122 | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.122 | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 0.122 | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 0.122 | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 0.122 | +0.0% |
| 1990 | -0.392 | -421.3% |
| 1991 | -0.392 | -0.0% |
| 1992 | -0.392 | -0.0% |
| 1993 | -0.392 | -0.0% |
| 1994 | -0.392 | -0.0% |
| 1995 | -0.392 | -0.0% |
| 1996 | -0.392 | -0.0% |
| 1997 | -0.392 | -0.0% |
| 1998 | -0.392 | -0.0% |
| 1999 | -0.392 | -0.0% |
| 2000 | 1.84 | -568.4% |
| 2001 | 1.63 | -11.3% |
| 2002 | 1.63 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 1.63 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 1.63 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 1.63 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 1.63 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 1.63 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 1.38 | -15.6% |
| 2009 | 1.38 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 1.38 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 1.38 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 1.38 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 0.433 | -68.5% |
| 2014 | 0.433 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 0.433 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 0.248 | -42.7% |
| 2017 | 0.248 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0.248 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 0.248 | +0.0% |
| 2020 | -0.073 | -129.4% |
| 2021 | -0.073 | -0.0% |
| 2022 | 0.3 | -511.0% |
| 2023 | 0.3 | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 0.3 | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 0.3 | +0.0% |
Serbia compared with similar countries
- Serbia's 0.3 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.478, 63% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
- Serbia's 0.3 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 1.46, 21% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | -1.19 | -1.19 | -1.19 | 1 |
| 1790s | -1.11 | -1.19 | -0.447 | 10 |
| 1800s | -1.43 | -2.09 | -0.447 | 10 |
| 1810s | -1.58 | -2.09 | -0.447 | 10 |
| 1820s | -1.39 | -1.39 | -1.39 | 10 |
| 1830s | -1.39 | -1.39 | -1.39 | 10 |
| 1840s | 0.4584 | -0.068 | 0.59 | 10 |
| 1850s | 0.2272 | -1.22 | 0.59 | 10 |
| 1860s | -1.22 | -1.22 | -1.22 | 10 |
| 1870s | -1.22 | -1.22 | -1.22 | 10 |
| 1880s | -1.22 | -1.22 | -1.22 | 10 |
| 1890s | -1.22 | -1.22 | -1.22 | 10 |
| 1900s | -0.7723 | -1.22 | -0.534 | 10 |
| 1910s | -0.6507 | -1.19 | 0.146 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.1296 | -0.018 | 0.146 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.3188 | -0.018 | 0.403 | 10 |
| 1940s | -0.9141 | -1.68 | 0.403 | 10 |
| 1950s | -0.0826 | -0.151 | 0.02 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.1118 | 0.02 | 0.122 | 10 |
| 1990s | -0.392 | -0.392 | -0.392 | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.6 | 1.38 | 1.84 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.6416 | 0.248 | 1.38 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.1757 | -0.073 | 0.3 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Serbia
- 103 Niger 0.387 compare
- 104 Mauritania 0.339 compare
- 105 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0.335 compare
- 107 Qatar 0.294 compare
- 108 Iraq 0.288 compare
- 109 Cote d'Ivoire 0.285 compare
More reference data data for Serbia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.6055 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3321 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3467 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.03 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.29 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.44 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 15.2 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.89 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is elite consultations score in Serbia?
- Elite consultations score in Serbia was 0.3 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest elite consultations score recorded in Serbia?
- The highest recorded value was 1.84 in 2000.
- What is the lowest elite consultations score recorded in Serbia?
- The lowest recorded value was -2.09 in 1804.
- How does Serbia rank for elite consultations score?
- Serbia ranks 106th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is elite consultations score rising or falling in Serbia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 30.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Serbia data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Elite Consultations Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites consult other elites across the political spectrum and from relevant sectors of society and business when considering important policy changes.