Elite Consultations Score in Lithuania
Lithuania: Elite Consultations Score was 2.2 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2025)
2.2
Change on year
up 16.5%
World rank
20th
of 176 countries
All-time high
2.83
in 2007
All-time low
-2.18
in 1940
Years of data
231
1795–2025
Elite Consultations Score in Lithuania, 1795–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for elite consultations score in Lithuania is 2.2, measured in 2025.
That represents a change of up 16.5% on the previous year and down 10.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, elite consultations score in Lithuania peaked at 2.83 in 2007 and was at its lowest, -2.18, in 1940.
Lithuania ranks 20th of 176 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Elite Consultations Score in Lithuania, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1795 | -2.1 | — |
| 1796 | -2.1 | -0.0% |
| 1797 | -2.1 | -0.0% |
| 1798 | -2.1 | -0.0% |
| 1799 | -2.1 | -0.0% |
| 1800 | -2.1 | -0.0% |
| 1801 | -1.87 | -11.1% |
| 1802 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1803 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1804 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1805 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1806 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1807 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1808 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1809 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1810 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1811 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1812 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1813 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1814 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1815 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1816 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1817 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1818 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1819 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1820 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1821 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1822 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1823 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1824 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1825 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1826 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1827 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1828 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1829 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1830 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1831 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1832 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1833 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1834 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1835 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1836 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1837 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1838 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1839 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1840 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1841 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1842 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1843 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1844 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1845 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1846 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1847 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1848 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1849 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1850 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1851 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1852 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1853 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1854 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1855 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1856 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1857 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1858 | -1.8 | -3.3% |
| 1859 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1860 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1861 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1862 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1863 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1864 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1865 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1866 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1867 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1868 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1869 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1870 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1871 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1872 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1873 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1874 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1875 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1876 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1877 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1878 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1879 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1880 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1881 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1882 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1883 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1884 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1885 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1886 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1887 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1888 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1889 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1890 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1891 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1892 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1893 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1894 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1895 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1896 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1897 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1898 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1899 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1900 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1901 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1902 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1903 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1904 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1905 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1906 | -1.06 | -41.2% |
| 1907 | -1.04 | -2.0% |
| 1908 | -1.1 | +5.9% |
| 1909 | -1.1 | -0.0% |
| 1910 | -1.1 | -0.0% |
| 1911 | -1.1 | -0.0% |
| 1912 | -1.1 | -0.0% |
| 1913 | -1.1 | -0.0% |
| 1914 | -1.1 | -0.0% |
| 1915 | -1.1 | -0.0% |
| 1916 | -1.1 | -0.0% |
| 1917 | -0.695 | -36.9% |
| 1918 | 0.887 | -227.6% |
| 1919 | 0.887 | +0.0% |
| 1920 | 1.07 | +20.9% |
| 1921 | 1.07 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 1.07 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 1.07 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 1.07 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 1.07 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 1.07 | +0.0% |
| 1927 | -0.308 | -128.7% |
| 1928 | -0.492 | +59.7% |
| 1929 | -0.492 | -0.0% |
| 1930 | -0.492 | -0.0% |
| 1931 | -0.492 | -0.0% |
| 1932 | -0.492 | -0.0% |
| 1933 | -0.492 | -0.0% |
| 1934 | -0.492 | -0.0% |
| 1935 | -0.492 | -0.0% |
| 1936 | -0.492 | -0.0% |
| 1937 | -0.737 | +49.8% |
| 1938 | -0.737 | -0.0% |
| 1939 | -0.737 | -0.0% |
| 1940 | -2.18 | +196.3% |
| 1941 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1942 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1943 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1944 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1945 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1946 | -1.78 | -18.4% |
| 1947 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1948 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1949 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1950 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1951 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1952 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1953 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1954 | -0.448 | -74.9% |
| 1955 | -0.448 | -0.0% |
| 1956 | -0.448 | -0.0% |
| 1957 | -0.448 | -0.0% |
| 1958 | -0.448 | -0.0% |
| 1959 | -0.448 | -0.0% |
| 1960 | -0.448 | -0.0% |
| 1961 | -0.448 | -0.0% |
| 1962 | -0.448 | -0.0% |
| 1963 | -0.448 | -0.0% |
| 1964 | -0.448 | -0.0% |
| 1965 | -0.556 | +24.1% |
| 1966 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1967 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1968 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1969 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1970 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1971 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1972 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1973 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1974 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1975 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1976 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1977 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1978 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1979 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1980 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1981 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1982 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1983 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1984 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1985 | -0.211 | -62.1% |
| 1986 | -0.374 | +77.3% |
| 1987 | -0.243 | -35.0% |
| 1988 | -0.243 | -0.0% |
| 1989 | -0.015 | -93.8% |
| 1990 | 1.24 | -8333.3% |
| 1991 | 1.24 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 1.24 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 1.35 | +9.6% |
| 1994 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 1.35 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 1.66 | +22.5% |
| 1999 | 1.66 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 1.66 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 2.09 | +26.4% |
| 2002 | 2.09 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 2.09 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 2.09 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 2.3 | +9.8% |
| 2006 | 2.6 | +13.0% |
| 2007 | 2.83 | +9.2% |
| 2008 | 2.83 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 2.16 | -23.8% |
| 2010 | 2.26 | +4.6% |
| 2011 | 2.26 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 2.26 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 2.07 | -8.5% |
| 2014 | 2.46 | +19.0% |
| 2015 | 2.46 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 1.61 | -34.4% |
| 2017 | 1.52 | -5.9% |
| 2018 | 1.35 | -11.3% |
| 2019 | 1.64 | +21.8% |
| 2020 | 2.05 | +24.8% |
| 2021 | 1.79 | -12.5% |
| 2022 | 1.79 | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 1.89 | +5.4% |
| 2024 | 1.89 | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 2.2 | +16.5% |
Lithuania compared with similar countries
- Lithuania's 2.2 is above the median for high income countries, which is 1.69, 1.3× the median. (55 countries reporting)
- Lithuania's 2.2 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 1.46, 1.5× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1790s | -2.1 | -2.1 | -2.1 | 5 |
| 1800s | -1.89 | -2.1 | -1.87 | 10 |
| 1810s | -1.87 | -1.87 | -1.87 | 10 |
| 1820s | -1.87 | -1.87 | -1.87 | 10 |
| 1830s | -1.87 | -1.87 | -1.87 | 10 |
| 1840s | -1.87 | -1.87 | -1.87 | 10 |
| 1850s | -1.85 | -1.87 | -1.8 | 10 |
| 1860s | -1.81 | -1.8 | -1.8 | 10 |
| 1870s | -1.81 | -1.8 | -1.8 | 10 |
| 1880s | -1.81 | -1.8 | -1.8 | 10 |
| 1890s | -1.81 | -1.8 | -1.8 | 10 |
| 1900s | -1.51 | -1.8 | -1.04 | 10 |
| 1910s | -0.6628 | -1.1 | 0.887 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.6212 | -0.492 | 1.07 | 10 |
| 1930s | -0.5655 | -0.737 | -0.492 | 10 |
| 1940s | -2.02 | -2.18 | -1.78 | 10 |
| 1950s | -0.982 | -1.78 | -0.448 | 10 |
| 1960s | -0.502 | -0.556 | -0.448 | 10 |
| 1970s | -0.556 | -0.556 | -0.556 | 10 |
| 1980s | -0.3866 | -0.556 | -0.015 | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.38 | 1.24 | 1.66 | 10 |
| 2000s | 2.28 | 1.66 | 2.83 | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.99 | 1.35 | 2.46 | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.93 | 1.79 | 2.2 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Lithuania
More reference data data for Lithuania
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2893 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1106 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1208 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9699 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.6729 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.5859 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.41 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.6578 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is elite consultations score in Lithuania?
- Elite consultations score in Lithuania was 2.2 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest elite consultations score recorded in Lithuania?
- The highest recorded value was 2.83 in 2007.
- What is the lowest elite consultations score recorded in Lithuania?
- The lowest recorded value was -2.18 in 1940.
- How does Lithuania rank for elite consultations score?
- Lithuania ranks 20th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is elite consultations score rising or falling in Lithuania?
- Over the last ten years it is down 10.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Lithuania data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Elite Consultations Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 231 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites consult other elites across the political spectrum and from relevant sectors of society and business when considering important policy changes.